|
Post by diamondstorm on Jan 9, 2024 3:31:43 GMT
No George Wasington-Successful Whiskey Rebellion? Let's say the American Revolution still succeeds without him, how would the Whiskey Rebellion have played out? To be honest the Whiskey Rebellion might be butterflied away without George Washington as the national government might either be very different or not even exist without a figure like him to rally around. So in order to get to the issue of the Whiskey Rebellion, you would need to figure out if a more centralized national government than under the Articles of Confederation would still come to be and, if so, what form it would take.
|
|
|
Post by Otto Kretschmer on Jan 10, 2024 15:50:52 GMT
WI: The shogunate wins the Boshin war.
|
|
|
Post by Otto Kretschmer on Jan 11, 2024 15:48:38 GMT
AHC: with any number of PoDs before 1900 , screw the US so much that it never becomes a superpower but is like Brazil - a middle income country with a small army and no power projection capacity.
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,857
Likes: 13,243
|
Post by stevep on Jan 11, 2024 16:45:29 GMT
AHC: with any number of PoDs before 1900 , screw the US so much that it never becomes a superpower but is like Brazil - a middle income country with a small army and no power projection capacity.
Based on a rough TL I have for a possible ISOTl scenario.
a) A somewhat different American revolution which is less successful with Britain maintaining the region north of the Ohio valley, along with Georgia - using its claims west to the Mississippi and Florida.
b) In a 1812 equivalent you get a longer conflict in which maintains the British territories, sees the New England Confederation [NEC] established - as a result of the longer war and Washington's hostility towards the interests of the New England region. Also the US suffers badly with a lot of destruction in coastal areas and slave unrest, many slaves escaping to Georgia, where they form a sizeable element of the population with an obvious reason for loyalty to the British crown. Couple with increasing distrust between the two nations leading to reduced migration and investment for the US.
One other significant factor is that with the loss of so much territory in the north compared to OTL despite also losing Georgia [including Alabama and Mississippi states] and Florida the US is predominantly a slave-holding nation, especially in the senate and a slightly earlier ending of slavery in the British empire heightens the tension over this issue.
Furthermore the better position of the UK results in the agreed extension of the border westwards on the 45th parallel rather than the 49th.
c) Either the US has similar victories as OTL over Mexico - having still getting the Louisiana purchase - but then loses most of those lands to Britain/Canada and Mexico in a later war - or Mexico gets a much better deal with a shorter and far less destructive independence war and it establishes a stable government. In the latter case it successfully defends Tejas against the rebels and then later defeats a US attack, possibly with UK support.
d) At some time tensions over slavery boils over with possibly a successful northern break-away which either stays an independent state or joins with the NEC.
e) At some point slavery ends in the south but the country remains under-developed and with continued tension with its smaller but more economically developed northern neighbour, the latter probably having good relations with the kingdom of Canada.
If the borders of the rump US in this scenario are basically north of the larger Georgia, the west bank of the Mississippi and some neighbouring regions into part of the great plains and say in the north including Kentucky and Virginia - which might or might not lose OTL W Virginia - and Maryland its still going to be sizeable but underdeveloped and handicapped by deep internal social and racial divisions and poor relations with its neighbours. Possibly with a measure of internal instability and intermittent military rule as OTL Brazil. Its a significant local power but not really fulfilling its potential.
|
|
|
Post by Otto Kretschmer on Jan 11, 2024 17:18:53 GMT
AHC: with any number of PoDs before 1900 , screw the US so much that it never becomes a superpower but is like Brazil - a middle income country with a small army and no power projection capacity.
Based on a rough TL I have for a possible ISOTl scenario.
a) A somewhat different American revolution which is less successful with Britain maintaining the region north of the Ohio valley, along with Georgia - using its claims west to the Mississippi and Florida.
b) In a 1812 equivalent you get a longer conflict in which maintains the British territories, sees the New England Confederation [NEC] established - as a result of the longer war and Washington's hostility towards the interests of the New England region. Also the US suffers badly with a lot of destruction in coastal areas and slave unrest, many slaves escaping to Georgia, where they form a sizeable element of the population with an obvious reason for loyalty to the British crown. Couple with increasing distrust between the two nations leading to reduced migration and investment for the US.
One other significant factor is that with the loss of so much territory in the north compared to OTL despite also losing Georgia [including Alabama and Mississippi states] and Florida the US is predominantly a slave-holding nation, especially in the senate and a slightly earlier ending of slavery in the British empire heightens the tension over this issue.
Furthermore the better position of the UK results in the agreed extension of the border westwards on the 45th parallel rather than the 49th.
c) Either the US has similar victories as OTL over Mexico - having still getting the Louisiana purchase - but then loses most of those lands to Britain/Canada and Mexico in a later war - or Mexico gets a much better deal with a shorter and far less destructive independence war and it establishes a stable government. In the latter case it successfully defends Tejas against the rebels and then later defeats a US attack, possibly with UK support.
d) At some time tensions over slavery boils over with possibly a successful northern break-away which either stays an independent state or joins with the NEC.
e) At some point slavery ends in the south but the country remains under-developed and with continued tension with its smaller but more economically developed northern neighbour, the latter probably having good relations with the kingdom of Canada.
If the borders of the rump US in this scenario are basically north of the larger Georgia, the west bank of the Mississippi and some neighbouring regions into part of the great plains and say in the north including Kentucky and Virginia - which might or might not lose OTL W Virginia - and Maryland its still going to be sizeable but underdeveloped and handicapped by deep internal social and racial divisions and poor relations with its neighbours. Possibly with a measure of internal instability and intermittent military rule as OTL Brazil. Its a significant local power but not really fulfilling its potential.
What if the British just had a different model of colonization? Instead of letting the colonists rule over themselves, they take a more heavy handed approach and make the entire British America a copy of the South. When the colony finally gains independence, it is much poorer and with much less democratic tradition and evolves into an Anglo copy of Argentina.
|
|
|
Post by Otto Kretschmer on Jan 11, 2024 18:54:00 GMT
AHC/WI: Sinitic Japan
With a PoD before 1 AD, make Japan be colonized by the Han Chiness people instead of the Yayoi/Yamato. The earlier this colonization happens, the better. Best if the colonization happens during the Shang or early Zhou dynasty.
stevep, 575?
|
|
Zyobot
Fleet admiral
Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
Posts: 17,352
Likes: 7,260
|
Post by Zyobot on Jan 11, 2024 21:19:38 GMT
'George Washington Serves A Third Term'.
|
|
|
Post by Max Sinister on Jan 12, 2024 12:38:08 GMT
AHC: wank Buddhism as much as possible. Kim Stanley Robinson's "The Years of Rice and Salt" seems like this.
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,857
Likes: 13,243
|
Post by stevep on Jan 12, 2024 19:41:21 GMT
Based on a rough TL I have for a possible ISOTl scenario.
a) A somewhat different American revolution which is less successful with Britain maintaining the region north of the Ohio valley, along with Georgia - using its claims west to the Mississippi and Florida.
b) In a 1812 equivalent you get a longer conflict in which maintains the British territories, sees the New England Confederation [NEC] established - as a result of the longer war and Washington's hostility towards the interests of the New England region. Also the US suffers badly with a lot of destruction in coastal areas and slave unrest, many slaves escaping to Georgia, where they form a sizeable element of the population with an obvious reason for loyalty to the British crown. Couple with increasing distrust between the two nations leading to reduced migration and investment for the US.
One other significant factor is that with the loss of so much territory in the north compared to OTL despite also losing Georgia [including Alabama and Mississippi states] and Florida the US is predominantly a slave-holding nation, especially in the senate and a slightly earlier ending of slavery in the British empire heightens the tension over this issue.
Furthermore the better position of the UK results in the agreed extension of the border westwards on the 45th parallel rather than the 49th.
c) Either the US has similar victories as OTL over Mexico - having still getting the Louisiana purchase - but then loses most of those lands to Britain/Canada and Mexico in a later war - or Mexico gets a much better deal with a shorter and far less destructive independence war and it establishes a stable government. In the latter case it successfully defends Tejas against the rebels and then later defeats a US attack, possibly with UK support.
d) At some time tensions over slavery boils over with possibly a successful northern break-away which either stays an independent state or joins with the NEC.
e) At some point slavery ends in the south but the country remains under-developed and with continued tension with its smaller but more economically developed northern neighbour, the latter probably having good relations with the kingdom of Canada.
If the borders of the rump US in this scenario are basically north of the larger Georgia, the west bank of the Mississippi and some neighbouring regions into part of the great plains and say in the north including Kentucky and Virginia - which might or might not lose OTL W Virginia - and Maryland its still going to be sizeable but underdeveloped and handicapped by deep internal social and racial divisions and poor relations with its neighbours. Possibly with a measure of internal instability and intermittent military rule as OTL Brazil. Its a significant local power but not really fulfilling its potential.
What if the British just had a different model of colonization? Instead of letting the colonists rule over themselves, they take a more heavy handed approach and make the entire British America a copy of the South. When the colony finally gains independence, it is much poorer and with much less democratic tradition and evolves into an Anglo copy of Argentina.
I think the problem here was that the monarchy and state didn't have that much power. Although the 1st settlement, in Jamestown Virginia was with royal support many of the latter ones were by group seeking to avoid whoever was in power in Britain. This was further undermined by the monarchy losing the civil war in the 1640's. Even through Charles II and his brother sought to expand royal power again it proved too late - fortunately for Britain and William III came to power with clear limitations on his position.
You had a centralized system of government from Saxon times, which gave an edge over rivals like Spain and France but it always had checks and balances in it.
|
|
|
Post by Otto Kretschmer on Jan 13, 2024 11:56:45 GMT
AHC: make Mongolic languages be spoken in as large area and by as many people as possible.
|
|
Zyobot
Fleet admiral
Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
Posts: 17,352
Likes: 7,260
|
Post by Zyobot on Jan 13, 2024 21:18:52 GMT
'AHC: More Evangelistic Judaism'.
|
|
|
Post by Otto Kretschmer on Jan 13, 2024 21:20:54 GMT
'AHC: More Evangelistic Judaism'. Isn't that OTL (I.e. Christianity)?
|
|
Zyobot
Fleet admiral
Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
Posts: 17,352
Likes: 7,260
|
Post by Zyobot on Jan 13, 2024 21:23:44 GMT
'AHC: More Evangelistic Judaism'. Isn't that OTL (I.e. Christianity)? Not what I mean. Rather, my aim is to make Judaism more evangelistic without Jesus (or anything else that spawns a whole new religion, for that matter). Doesn't have to be on the level of OTL Christianity, but it shouldn't be as reserved or insular as the Judaism we know, either.
|
|
|
Post by Otto Kretschmer on Jan 13, 2024 21:29:52 GMT
Isn't that OTL (I.e. Christianity)? Not what I mean. Rather, my aim is to make Judaism more evangelistic without Jesus (or anything else that spawns a whole new religion, for that matter). Doesn't have to be on the level of OTL Christianity, but it shouldn't be as reserved or insular as the Judaism we know, either. What if the kingdom of Israel somehow turns into a major power and conquers Egypt and/or Syria/Mesopotamia?
|
|
Zyobot
Fleet admiral
Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
Posts: 17,352
Likes: 7,260
|
Post by Zyobot on Jan 14, 2024 22:35:08 GMT
'AHC: Italian Colonial Empire'.
|
|