|
Post by Otto Kretschmer on Nov 26, 2023 18:00:51 GMT
AHC: best case scenario for Napoleon.
|
|
|
Post by American hist on Nov 26, 2023 20:03:00 GMT
An interesting idea: would longbows have been used during the American Civil War could they be used on the battlefield, particularly aided by the Confederacy? Now, of course, you would have to have people trained in archery. The only feasible option would be for archers imported from the Orient or if native Americans were given the bow.
what would be the range of most union rifles and the longbows
|
|
mspence
Warrant Officer
Posts: 282
Likes: 244
|
Post by mspence on Nov 27, 2023 6:04:53 GMT
Pompey's Rome: WI Pompey had won the Roman Civil War?
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,857
Likes: 13,238
|
Post by stevep on Nov 27, 2023 23:47:28 GMT
Pompey's Rome: WI Pompey had won the Roman Civil War?
Well by that time Pompey had made it up with the Senate so a victory by him, especially a quick one, could reinforce the old order for a while although it could also mean a nasty purge of anyone though connected to the populist cause. Plus since Pompey would have control of the army and remembering what happened when he returned as a conquering hero from the east and was betrayed by the Senate could he try and be a more moderate Caesar - being a dictator in something like the more traditional sense than what Sula and Caesar did OTL.
|
|
Zyobot
Fleet admiral
Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
Posts: 17,352
Likes: 7,260
|
Post by Zyobot on Nov 29, 2023 0:39:52 GMT
‘Kievan Rus Without The Mongol Invasions’.
|
|
|
Post by Max Sinister on Nov 29, 2023 4:59:39 GMT
‘Kievan Rus Without The Mongol Invasions’.
Have you looked into my Chaos TL?
The thing is: If there are no Mongol Invasions, or they decided to invade some other place (India? North Africa?) instead of the Kievan Rus, so many things would change that you'd have to think about the development of the whole world. Or the Old World, at least.
|
|
|
Post by Otto Kretschmer on Dec 1, 2023 13:09:24 GMT
AHC: make an alphabetic writing system reach China before 200 BC.
|
|
|
Post by Otto Kretschmer on Dec 2, 2023 19:21:21 GMT
WI: Louis XIV born a girl, Philipe I becomes the king of France.
Other than being a better military commander, what else would distinguish his rule from that of his brother?
|
|
Zyobot
Fleet admiral
Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
Posts: 17,352
Likes: 7,260
|
Post by Zyobot on Dec 4, 2023 21:19:31 GMT
'President Hannibal Hamlin'.
|
|
|
Post by Otto Kretschmer on Dec 6, 2023 18:35:25 GMT
WI: Imhotep creates his own academy. What could it achieve if a philosophical school dedicated to the study of the natural world developed there?
|
|
|
Post by raharris1973 on Dec 7, 2023 12:25:25 GMT
What if Spain neglects Alta California throughout its American colonial career?
Every century starting in the 1500s, the Spanish did voyages along the difficult to navigate, foggy coast of Alta California, and at least starting the second time around in 1605 started seriously considering a colonization attempt. But they cancelled that aspiration, just having a few weak, poorly run missions in Baja California over the next 150 years, only establishing their first real permanent colony & mission at San Diego (de Alcala) in 1769. Jose Galvez, Spain's Visitador to New Spain, was an avid supporter of the effort, and tried to promote frontier development in California, using preemption of potential British competition (a premature estimate) or Dutch competition (an imaginary estimate) to justify the effort, starting in the 1760s, but he could not get endorsement of the Spanish Court to go ahead. However, he scored a breakthrough in the Spanish Court when he and the Court got corroboration of his general fears from the Spanish Ambassador to St. Petersburg. Russia. who heard about Empress Catherine the Great's alleged plans to colonize the northwest coast of North America down as far south as California. He got endorsement to move by 1769, starting San Diego then, Monterey in 1770, Sand Francisco in 1776, and the rest is history.
What if the Spanish Ambassador in Russia never hears anything of Catherine the Great's plans for Russian American colonization? Jose Galvez never gets Royal approval to unleash Junipero Serra and the Franciscans on Baja and then Alta California and their natives. Variable possible outcomes lie ahead: (a) an empty (of Europeans) indigenous California persists, at least through the time of the American Revolutionary War, 1774-1783?. (b) British California set up in the 1780s (1784 or later) or 1790s, possibly as a haven for American loyalists? (c) French explorer, La Perouse, establishes a French claim on his global Pacific cruise, that is reported back to France via a mail packet, even if, like OTL, he and all his hands are ultimately lost before making it back to the Indian Ocean or France? Possibly, France *just* starts up a fresh colony at Californie on the eve of la revolucion at home. - a wacky variant of (c) could be if in this world, Napoleon Buonaparte had a twin, named Giacomo, who unlike Napoleon, passed muster for the Perouse voyage....Napoleon in OTL tried out and made 'the finals' but was not selected for the crew. Giacomo was recorded as bravely and cleverly serving in the landing party in Californie, in the the account of the voyage that Perouse mailed back from Kamchatka [this really happened], but is lost with the rest of the expedition around New Guinea. Years later when Napoleon has become French Consul, and warlord supreme of western Europe, dominated Spain and extorted back Louisiana from Spain at San Ildefonso, for sentimental reason he also compels the Spanish, to also cede to France the pretty much still Spanish-vacant, or just freshly settled, Alte Californie, where his long lost twin brother pioneered, to France. When the Haitian revolt/French defeat and renewed war with Britain and Continental Coalition for him to give up his American dream then, Alte Californie, consisting of California, Nevada, northwest Arizona, Utah, Colorado, basically, is sold to the young USA along with the Louisiana territory. [Phew, that was long, and contrived]. (d) Spain begin Mission settlements and then ranches. probably run by Franciscans, like OTL, just starting later, from the 1783-84 timeframe after the Bourbon-Yankee versus Britain war is over, and Spanish-Hispanic California history is basically 15 years shorter than OTL with an accordingly smaller Californio population and shallower cultural roots before Yankee, British, and other maritime European types start influencing the coast and port towns of the province.
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,857
Likes: 13,238
|
Post by stevep on Dec 7, 2023 17:00:37 GMT
What if Spain neglects Alta California throughout its American colonial career? Every century starting in the 1500s, the Spanish did voyages along the difficult to navigate, foggy coast of Alta California, and at least starting the second time around in 1605 started seriously considering a colonization attempt. But they cancelled that aspiration, just having a few weak, poorly run missions in Baja California over the next 150 years, only establishing their first real permanent colony & mission at San Diego (de Alcala) in 1769. Jose Galvez, Spain's Visitador to New Spain, was an avid supporter of the effort, and tried to promote frontier development in California, using preemption of potential British competition (a premature estimate) or Dutch competition (an imaginary estimate) to justify the effort, starting in the 1760s, but he could not get endorsement of the Spanish Court to go ahead. However, he scored a breakthrough in the Spanish Court when he and the Court got corroboration of his general fears from the Spanish Ambassador to St. Petersburg. Russia. who heard about Empress Catherine the Great's alleged plans to colonize the northwest coast of North America down as far south as California. He got endorsement to move by 1769, starting San Diego then, Monterey in 1770, Sand Francisco in 1776, and the rest is history. What if the Spanish Ambassador in Russia never hears anything of Catherine the Great's plans for Russian American colonization? Jose Galvez never gets Royal approval to unleash Junipero Serra and the Franciscans on Baja and then Alta California and their natives. Variable possible outcomes lie ahead: (a) an empty (of Europeans) indigenous California persists, at least through the time of the American Revolutionary War, 1774-1783?. (b) British California set up in the 1780s (1784 or later) or 1790s, possibly as a haven for American loyalists? (c) French explorer, La Perouse, establishes a French claim on his global Pacific cruise, that is reported back to France via a mail packet, even if, like OTL, he and all his hands are ultimately lost before making it back to the Indian Ocean or France? Possibly, France *just* starts up a fresh colony at Californie on the eve of la revolucion at home. - a wacky variant of (c) could be if in this world, Napoleon Buonaparte had a twin, named Giacomo, who unlike Napoleon, passed muster for the Perouse voyage....Napoleon in OTL tried out and made 'the finals' but was not selected for the crew. Giacomo was recorded as bravely and cleverly serving in the landing party in Californie, in the the account of the voyage that Perouse mailed back from Kamchatka [this really happened], but is lost with the rest of the expedition around New Guinea. Years later when Napoleon has become French Consul, and warlord supreme of western Europe, dominated Spain and extorted back Louisiana from Spain at San Ildefonso, for sentimental reason he also compels the Spanish, to also cede to France the pretty much still Spanish-vacant, or just freshly settled, Alte Californie, where his long lost twin brother pioneered, to France. When the Haitian revolt/French defeat and renewed war with Britain and Continental Coalition for him to give up his American dream then, Alte Californie, consisting of California, Nevada, northwest Arizona, Utah, Colorado, basically, is sold to the young USA along with the Louisiana territory. [Phew, that was long, and contrived]. (d) Spain begin Mission settlements and then ranches. probably run by Franciscans, like OTL, just starting later, from the 1783-84 timeframe after the Bourbon-Yankee versus Britain war is over, and Spanish-Hispanic California history is basically 15 years shorter than OTL with an accordingly smaller Californio population and shallower cultural roots before Yankee, British, and other maritime European types start influencing the coast and port towns of the province.
Initial thoughts.
a) the region might stay colonized longer but sooner or later its going to come under the control of a European or former European colonial power.
b) Possibly a British presence as they had some interest in the region, although how much this was driven by the desire to counter the Spanish presence I don't know. Doubt it would be a possible refuge for loyalists after a successful revolution in the east coast colonies as its simply so difficult to reach. You could see interest initially further north in the Oregon region as a link up with overland scouting by the Hudson's Bay Company which then spreads south. This might be pushed a bit by the British government after the loss of the eastern American colonies as a way of increasing their presence in N America however.
c) Napoleon would probably have to be different in character as while he seems to have floated the idea of sending veterans to Louisiana after a successful crushing of the Haitian independence his focus was very much on continental Europe. Plus unless the naval balance changes greatly or there's a prolonged peace with Britain imperial France has little ability to project major power overseas, let alone any significant colonization.
One option here might be if Napoleon actually makes the list for the Perouse voyage and due to butterflies it - or at least he - survives. That would give him some knowledge of the area and a link to the region plus possibly even more importantly a decent understanding of how ships and navies actually function. A Napoleon who becomes a successful revolutionary general and then the French ruler could be a damned sight more dangerous for Britain especially and also seriously interested in such overseas settlements.
d) If Spain simply gets interested in the region a bit later with no major butterflies I think it simply means that the area remains overwhelmingly without European contact until either the US or another European power gets interested in the region. It might mean that if./when Mexico becomes independent of Spain it has no real claim to or interest in Alta California - which might possibly just delay American control if there's no Mexican claim to the region to take over. In fact with New Mexico and Arizona being relatively barren and unsettled you could see a larger Texas emerging from such an equivalent to the OTL 1846-48 US-Mexican war. However its still likely to end up colonized by someone.
|
|
|
Post by raharris1973 on Dec 8, 2023 1:20:55 GMT
a) the region might stay colonized longer but sooner or later its going to come under the control of a European or former European colonial power. Eventually, but it might just be a straight line from indigenous control to USA control. Or a two-stop line with the stop being either indigenous--->Anglo-American condominium---->USA [with British North America getting lands north of the Columbia river (Washington state), or Oregon & northward] or indigenous-->Mexican-->USA b) Possibly a British presence as they had some interest in the region, although how much this was driven by the desire to counter the Spanish presence I don't know. Doubt it would be a possible refuge for loyalists after a successful revolution in the east coast colonies as its simply so difficult to reach. You could see interest initially further north in the Oregon region as a link up with overland scouting by the Hudson's Bay Company which then spreads south. This might be pushed a bit by the British government after the loss of the eastern American colonies as a way of increasing their presence in N America however. More or less what I had in mind. So you're just suggesting, they would not *start* on the west coast in California in 1784 right out of the gate because it is so far, but they could roll south into California from Oregon a little later anyway? Sure. And they started to be active in the Oregon area, Vancouver island, not too long after anyway, with the Nootka sound crisis of 1790. c) Napoleon would probably have to be different in character as while he seems to have floated the idea of sending veterans to Louisiana after a successful crushing of the Haitian independence his focus was very much on continental Europe. Plus unless the naval balance changes greatly or there's a prolonged peace with Britain imperial France has little ability to project major power overseas, let alone any significant colonization.
One option here might be if Napoleon actually makes the list for the Perouse voyage and due to butterflies it - or at least he - survives. That would give him some knowledge of the area and a link to the region plus possibly even more importantly a decent understanding of how ships and navies actually function. A Napoleon who becomes a successful revolutionary general and then the French ruler could be a damned sight more dangerous for Britain especially and also seriously interested in such overseas settlements. For sure..... The only other alternative for the French I guess would be Perouse makes a claim, France starts colony that is abortive and short-lived, abandoned, because the revolution starts. Since the colony is abandoned, nobody occupies it. The area lay dormant (for Europeans) and uncolonized by Europeans a couple more decades. France cannot really do anything about it because of the Revolutionary and Napoleon Wars, where its focus was so continental. But by 1830, or a couple years earlier, Algeria proved that France is allowed to colonize again, and maybe the French King wants to revive the claim and thumb his nose at the Monroe Doctrine idea, and the Jackson Administration does not have the transcontinental power projection to throw a French garrison and settlement out? d) If Spain simply gets interested in the region a bit later with no major butterflies I think it simply means that the area remains overwhelmingly without European contact until either the US or another European power gets interested in the region. It might mean that if./when Mexico becomes independent of Spain it has no real claim to or interest in Alta California - which might possibly just delay American control if there's no Mexican claim to the region to take over. In fact with New Mexico and Arizona being relatively barren and unsettled you could see a larger Texas emerging from such an equivalent to the OTL 1846-48 US-Mexican war. However its still likely to end up colonized by someone. I don't think non-Mexicanization would likely lead to delay in Americanization. Oregon was not definitively owned or colonized by a single power, but the USA was keen to start staking a claim and using the Oregon Trail. And even a late starting Alta California, by 15 years, 20 years, 30 years would have its most natural association with New Spain/Mexico, and probably even *less* local separatist tendency than OTL. It will just be less populous, developed, and Mexico City politicians will care even less about it.
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,857
Likes: 13,238
|
Post by stevep on Dec 8, 2023 13:22:29 GMT
Quick reply as got to go out shortly. In general agreement.
c) If the French had some sort of claim and sought to apply it say 1830-40 then the US wouldn't really have any chance to oppose it and it could be costly for them to try. France had a large fleet and army and experience of projecting power around the world. California is about as far away from the US east coast as from France as the boat sails, which would be the only real way of getting people or equipment there. How many people France would seek to settle there and which groups with what success rate would be an issue. Further complicated if they found gold there with the resulting rush.
d) I don't think Mexico not having a claim to the region would delay matters much but possibly a few years. Its simply that if Mexico doesn't have a claim to the region its unlikely to be attacked and occupied in a war between Mexico and the US and then claimed at the peace.
Steve
|
|
mspence
Warrant Officer
Posts: 282
Likes: 244
|
Post by mspence on Dec 9, 2023 4:56:59 GMT
WI: French Florida, British Cuba
What if either had gotten them instead of Spain?
|
|