|
Post by American hist on Aug 17, 2023 23:34:00 GMT
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 67,964
Likes: 49,369
|
Post by lordroel on Aug 18, 2023 11:08:26 GMT
Okay, think we need to go back to the OP, of this thread which was:
NYC secedes from the US in early 1861
|
|
|
Post by American hist on Nov 11, 2023 2:06:34 GMT
civilwarnavy.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/NY-Navy-Yard_Ron-Field.pdwww.nyhistory.org/blogs/when-new-york-wanted-to-secedeNew York City Brooklyn naval I read some where they city contained over 1/3 or more of the Union naval vessels not to mention the city would have stopped significant revenue, manpower,manufacturing advantages the north had it with it being transferred to help the south had the city separated. In my opinion, I think the mayor use a massive bribery through his oligarchy of businessman, supporting him could’ve gotten the city Council to declare independence. However, first, it’s best to take care of the military and police opposition which is much harder. Unfortunately, all secession for New York City for whatever reason even a legal one could happen. The Confederates are likely to be stopped short if they tryd to seize the unions Brooklyn naval yard. If the confederate/session movement achieve this, they would have enough ships for the city and to even give to the confederacy, and use their navy to protect their commercial to both north and south irishamericancivilwar.com/generals/So many of these union generals are from New York City this would effect matters if the city separated. Thomas Francis Meagher Is one general who could have easily flipped to the Southern cause even with Fort Sumter being attacked by the Confederates. He most certainly would have served to defend New York City from attack. It would have been harder to get Sickle to side with the South, but if an alternative CSA president could refrain from attacking Fort Sumter or only blockade the water using artillery, which would have scared off the relief squadron if there was even a risk that they could be hit. sickles had his mind changed during January 1861 after the southern state forces began occupying federal property and more aggressive actions which he perceived as a threat to the US flag. well, I would like to think that a good confederate president, who was not Davis could persuade sickles if the CSA government lead by a different confederate president apologized to the federal government over the states actions I also really don’t think sickles would be persuaded. However the man was had impulsive behavior which is military record, was controversial. According to the rules, it does say if there is substantial contributions given, but I’ll let the moderator be the judge of that.
|
|
|
Post by Max Sinister on Nov 11, 2023 18:56:06 GMT
In "Decades of Darkness", the North American War ends when the *Americans control the place where NY's water comes from. As interesting as the PoD is: How could they prevent this from happening?
|
|
|
Post by American hist on Nov 12, 2023 20:55:58 GMT
In "Decades of Darkness", the North American War ends when the *Americans control the place where NY's water comes from. As interesting as the PoD is: How could they prevent this from happening? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City_water_supply_systemwww.nyc.gov/site/dep/water/history-of-new-york-citys-drinking-water.page#:~:text=After%20exploring%20alternatives%2C%20NYC water source would presumably be under the legal supervision of the state government unless Lincoln used federal force which he immediately would not lawfully have the means to. Ultimately The state governor could keep the city free until Lincoln used coercive measures which in the long run would hurt his prestige if the rebels were not blankly the assailants by northern eyes such as the attack on Fort Sumter. The state governor could hinder land operations being used against their sister City York City. With the Confederates not attacking Fort Sumter this already provided the alternative political landscape that the South enjoyed prior to their attack as it made the secessionist movement possible. During this time they can use NYC as A free trade city if this coup can take place dealing with the opposition. I suppose the Mayors forces can use assassins but they can't kill off the Union masses The Governor Of New York was democratic Horatio Seymour who not only was a peace democracy in 1864, but during the sessions crisis, He favored the South to be left in peace. During the aftermath of the war between the states, he wished to end Reconstruction as he was the 1868 Democratic candidate. It wasn't unheard of in the Northern to still side with the Union but to have voted down military actions against the South. Horacio Seymour, Tilden, and Franklin Pierce are examples of Union men who felt the union was to be saved through compromise. Many northern newspapers felt Lincoln's cohesive measures were what was dividing the country further forcing the South to be defensive. If the South had effective leadership they could take advantage of the fact many Northern people didn't want to fight their American brethren and said they wanted to compromise and preferred a peaceful solution, but the minute New York Souvirighty City was violated the day war arrived. I think an effective Confederate commander-in-chief would say since you reinforced those citadels upon our territory we have taken this as a Violation of the verbal armistice as we are preparing for the defense of our nation from your invasion.
|
|
|
Post by American hist on Nov 22, 2023 21:11:39 GMT
The union in 1861 had only 42 active vessels and 48 in reserves which only 3 were suitable for blockade service. With new york city out of the picture, this would immediately hurt the union. With the empire state haveing to deal with seperatism then other states will follow suit or have greater success such as Maryland, southern California etc linkblogs.shu.edu/nyc-history/2020/02/21/civil-war-new-york/link
|
|
oscssw
Senior chief petty officer
Posts: 967
Likes: 1,575
|
Post by oscssw on Nov 24, 2023 19:33:10 GMT
As usual, I have come late to this intriguing ATL.
First off I'd like to compliment the author. Very good premise with a lot to think about.
As a PacFleet sailor I have had no personal experience with BNY so I did some research which convinced me in either Union or Reb hands it was a priceless asset. This is what I found.
23 February 1801, the federal government purchased 41.93 acres of waterfront land bordering Wallabout Bay for $40,000. It contained an operational private shipyard, with a beach, waterfront, and a channel that was 36 feet deep and 100 yards wide. This was the future site for the New York Navy Yard, or Brooklyn Navy Yard, as locals called it.
In 1805, the first six buildings were built. In 1806, New York Navy Yard received its first commandant, Lieutenant Jonathan Thorn. That same year, the commandant’s house (Quarters A) was completed.
During the War of 1812, the yard saw considerable activity, fitting out more than 100 ships for war.
In 1820, New York Navy Yard built its first ship, USS Ohio. After launching, the ship-of-the-line went into ordinary and decayed badly. In 1838, Ohio was refitted for service and joined the Navy’s Mediterranean Squadron. Serving as a flagship for two years, Ohio protected commerce and conducted anti–slave trade patrols off the coast of West Africa.
In 1833, Commodore Matthew C. Perry and other young naval officers founded the U.S. Naval Lyceum in Building 1 of the New York Navy Yard. The Naval Lyceum was a professional military organization that also served as a center of learning
1837–50, New York Navy Yard launched four sloops of war, in addition to the steam frigate USS Missouri and the brig USS Somers. Of the "Mutiny" fame. Somers served as a school ship for the training of teenage naval apprentice volunteers.
1851, Dry Dock No. 1 was completed. The project took ten years to finish at a cost of $2,113,173. The granite dry dock has 36-foot-deep. Five more dry docks were to follow.
During the Civil War, the New York Navy Yard had become a major shipbuilder and outfitter of ships for the war. When the war began, there were 1,650 men employed at the shipyard. At the war’s end, nearly 6,000 civilian workers were on the payroll. Workers built 16 new warships and converted 416 commercial ships into warships during the four years of war.
19 February 1862, the Union Navy’s first ironclad, USS Monitor, arrived at New York Navy Yard. Although it was built at Continental Iron Works in the Greenpoint neighborhood of Brooklyn, it was completed, outfitted, armed, crewed, and commissioned at the New York Navy Yard.
The yard had a very skilled work force especially in the new ship building arts of iron and steam. It had shops that were unsurpassed. It was a logistical base that made the blockade viable.
IMVHO the Union would not, after the basket screw that gave the Norfolk yard only slightly damaged to the Rebs, allow this yard captured or materially damaged by "Seccesh" forces in NYC.
partial list of Ships Constructed at the Brooklyn Navy Yard up tomn1865
NAME TYPE. TONNAGE. IN SERVICE DATE
OHIO 74 Gun Ship of the Line; 2257 tons 30 May 1820 SAVANNAH 44 Gun Frigate 1820 5 May 1838 SABINE 44 Gun Frigate 1822 3 Feb 1855 VINCENNES 18 Gun Sloop of War; 700 tons 1825 27 Apr 1826 FAIRFIELD 18 Gun Sloop of War 1826 28 June LEXINGTON 18 Gun Sloop of War; 691 tons 1825 9 Mar 1826 PEACOCK 18 Gun, 2nd classSloop of War 30 Dec 1828 n.d. MORRIS Revenue Cutter 1831 30 Jun 1831 ENTERPRISE 10 Gun Schooner 194 tons 26 Oct 1831 DOLPHIN 10 Gun Brig, 224 tons 17 Jun 1836 PILOT 2 Gun Schooner Sep 1836 FULTON 9 Gun PaddleWheel Steamer 18 May 1837 LEVANT 18 Gun Sloop of War 28 Dec 1837 DECATUR 16 Gun Sloop of War 9 Apr 1839 MISSOURI 10 Gun Paddle Wheel Steamer; 1700 tons 1839 7 Jan 1841 early 1842 SOMERS 10 Gun Brig 1842 16 Apr 1842 12 May 1842 SAN JACINTO 6 Gun Sloop of War 1847 16 Apr 1850 n.d. ALBANY 20 Gun Sloop of War; 1064 tons 27 Jun 1846 FULTON 9 Gun Paddle Wheel Steamer 30 Aug 25 Jan 1852 NIAGARA 40 Gun Steamer Frigate 6 Apr 1857 IROQUOIS 6 Gun Sloop of War 24 Nov 1859 ONEIDA 9 Gun Sloop of War 28 Feb 1862 OCTORORA 6 Gun Side Wheel Double Ender 1861 7 Dec 1861 28 Feb 1862 ADIRONDACK 9 Gun Steam Sloop of War 1861 22 Feb 1862 30 Jun 1862 LACKAWANNA 9 Gun Steam Sloop of War 1862 9 Aug 1862 8 Jan 1863 TICONDEROGA 9 Gun Steam Sloop of War 1861 16 Oct 1862 12 May 1863 SHAMROCK 8 Gun Side Wheeler Double Ender 13 Jun 1864 MACKINAW 8 Gun Side Wheeler Double Ender 1862 22 Apr 1863 23 Apr 1864 PEORIA 8 Gun Side Wheeler Double Ender 29 Oct 1863 TULLAHOMA 8 Gun Side Wheeler Double Ender 28 Nov 1863 ALGONQUIN 12 Gun Side Wheeler
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 67,964
Likes: 49,369
|
Post by lordroel on Nov 24, 2023 19:46:08 GMT
never mind
Sorry, only deleted what i assumed was a double post.
|
|
|
Post by American hist on Dec 18, 2023 4:43:52 GMT
As usual, I have come late to this intriguing ATL.
First off I'd like to compliment the author. Very good premise with a lot to think about.
As a PacFleet sailor I have had no personal experience with BNY so I did some research which convinced me in either Union or Reb hands it was a priceless asset. This is what I found.
23 February 1801, the federal government purchased 41.93 acres of waterfront land bordering Wallabout Bay for $40,000. It contained an operational private shipyard, with a beach, waterfront, and a channel that was 36 feet deep and 100 yards wide. This was the future site for the New York Navy Yard, or Brooklyn Navy Yard, as locals called it.
In 1805, the first six buildings were built. In 1806, New York Navy Yard received its first commandant, Lieutenant Jonathan Thorn. That same year, the commandant’s house (Quarters A) was completed.
During the War of 1812, the yard saw considerable activity, fitting out more than 100 ships for war.
In 1820, New York Navy Yard built its first ship, USS Ohio. After launching, the ship-of-the-line went into ordinary and decayed badly. In 1838, Ohio was refitted for service and joined the Navy’s Mediterranean Squadron. Serving as a flagship for two years, Ohio protected commerce and conducted anti–slave trade patrols off the coast of West Africa.
In 1833, Commodore Matthew C. Perry and other young naval officers founded the U.S. Naval Lyceum in Building 1 of the New York Navy Yard. The Naval Lyceum was a professional military organization that also served as a center of learning
1837–50, New York Navy Yard launched four sloops of war, in addition to the steam frigate USS Missouri and the brig USS Somers. Of the "Mutiny" fame. Somers served as a school ship for the training of teenage naval apprentice volunteers.
1851, Dry Dock No. 1 was completed. The project took ten years to finish at a cost of $2,113,173. The granite dry dock has 36-foot-deep. Five more dry docks were to follow.
During the Civil War, the New York Navy Yard had become a major shipbuilder and outfitter of ships for the war. When the war began, there were 1,650 men employed at the shipyard. At the war’s end, nearly 6,000 civilian workers were on the payroll. Workers built 16 new warships and converted 416 commercial ships into warships during the four years of war.
19 February 1862, the Union Navy’s first ironclad, USS Monitor, arrived at New York Navy Yard. Although it was built at Continental Iron Works in the Greenpoint neighborhood of Brooklyn, it was completed, outfitted, armed, crewed, and commissioned at the New York Navy Yard.
The yard had a very skilled work force especially in the new ship building arts of iron and steam. It had shops that were unsurpassed. It was a logistical base that made the blockade viable.
IMVHO the Union would not, after the basket screw that gave the Norfolk yard only slightly damaged to the Rebs, allow this yard captured or materially damaged by "Seccesh" forces in NYC.
partial list of Ships Constructed at the Brooklyn Navy Yard up tomn1865
NAME TYPE. TONNAGE. IN SERVICE DATE
OHIO 74 Gun Ship of the Line; 2257 tons 30 May 1820 SAVANNAH 44 Gun Frigate 1820 5 May 1838 SABINE 44 Gun Frigate 1822 3 Feb 1855 VINCENNES 18 Gun Sloop of War; 700 tons 1825 27 Apr 1826 FAIRFIELD 18 Gun Sloop of War 1826 28 June LEXINGTON 18 Gun Sloop of War; 691 tons 1825 9 Mar 1826 PEACOCK 18 Gun, 2nd classSloop of War 30 Dec 1828 n.d. MORRIS Revenue Cutter 1831 30 Jun 1831 ENTERPRISE 10 Gun Schooner 194 tons 26 Oct 1831 DOLPHIN 10 Gun Brig, 224 tons 17 Jun 1836 PILOT 2 Gun Schooner Sep 1836 FULTON 9 Gun PaddleWheel Steamer 18 May 1837 LEVANT 18 Gun Sloop of War 28 Dec 1837 DECATUR 16 Gun Sloop of War 9 Apr 1839 MISSOURI 10 Gun Paddle Wheel Steamer; 1700 tons 1839 7 Jan 1841 early 1842 SOMERS 10 Gun Brig 1842 16 Apr 1842 12 May 1842 SAN JACINTO 6 Gun Sloop of War 1847 16 Apr 1850 n.d. ALBANY 20 Gun Sloop of War; 1064 tons 27 Jun 1846 FULTON 9 Gun Paddle Wheel Steamer 30 Aug 25 Jan 1852 NIAGARA 40 Gun Steamer Frigate 6 Apr 1857 IROQUOIS 6 Gun Sloop of War 24 Nov 1859 ONEIDA 9 Gun Sloop of War 28 Feb 1862 OCTORORA 6 Gun Side Wheel Double Ender 1861 7 Dec 1861 28 Feb 1862 ADIRONDACK 9 Gun Steam Sloop of War 1861 22 Feb 1862 30 Jun 1862 LACKAWANNA 9 Gun Steam Sloop of War 1862 9 Aug 1862 8 Jan 1863 TICONDEROGA 9 Gun Steam Sloop of War 1861 16 Oct 1862 12 May 1863 SHAMROCK 8 Gun Side Wheeler Double Ender 13 Jun 1864 MACKINAW 8 Gun Side Wheeler Double Ender 1862 22 Apr 1863 23 Apr 1864 PEORIA 8 Gun Side Wheeler Double Ender 29 Oct 1863 TULLAHOMA 8 Gun Side Wheeler Double Ender 28 Nov 1863 ALGONQUIN 12 Gun Side Wheeler
Awesome facts! Can you briefly explain why having a dry dock is important? Was there a limit to the number of drydocks during the Civil War? Well, I understand. This discussion is about New York City’s independence. And I also think that this secession movement would at first not be associated with war, if it got off the ground.
|
|
|
Post by American hist on Dec 26, 2023 22:33:36 GMT
It would not be easy to form a story of how the NYC secessionist movement succeeded. However, I think we have ruled it would be possible. The free city doesn't have to win everyone's hearts in New York City. Rather, they He had the backing of the most powerful men in the city with influence elsewhere in New York State, which he achieved, as previously discussed. However, there would be many people in New York and the United States who would be neutral to fighting and just trying to get by another day, whether they be sailors who are at a loss to Lincoln's protectionist tariffs and the South separating from the union or they be jobs depending on southern and international trade who aren't sailors. If a free city could be established, other northern business people would flock to the town to avoid their market losses. In the American Revolution demographic changes allowed flocks of loyalist to seek refuge in British controlled cities particularly New York City we would see the same with copperheads and some peace democrats digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1108&=&context=mainehistoryjournal&=&sei-redir=1&referer=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.google.com%252Furl%253Fq%253Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fdigitalcommons.library.umaine.edu%252Fcgi%252Fviewcontent.cgi%25253Farticle%25253D1108%252526context%25253Dmainehistoryjournal%2526sa%253DU%2526ved%253D2ahUKEwitzN6m562DAxVnjYkEHWGwDfM4FBAWegQICxAB%2526usg%253DAOvVaw0YZmOg-MrbhvvLUM3AZuJs#search=%22https%3A%2F%2Fdigitalcommons.library.umaine.edu%2Fcgi%2Fviewcontent.cgi%3Farticle%3D1108%26context%3Dmainehistoryjournal%22 It is to be remembered the nativists, who made up much of the Republican Party during this time, had substantial, if not dominant, powers in the northeast, particularly New England. www.nps.gov/articles/irish-soldiers-in-the-union-army.htm(From national park service reference article Colonel Corcoran refused to march the regiment on parade for the 19-year old Prince of Wales, who was visiting New York City at the time, as a protest to the ineffective British response to the Irish Famine. Corcoran was removed from command and a court martial was pending over the matter when the Civil War began. With the outbreak of war, the charges were dropped and Corcoran was allowed to take his command perhaps he would not have been allowed back In good grace for only allowed if he was to cooperate with the secessionist At this time the New York City militia was under the local control which assumes it would go with the city separation . Now if the CSA and New York City combined could adequately pay these Irish troops they have them selves in army. The immigrants had grounds to fear a union war to establish northern and party domination against the South, which could allow Yankee values and other policies to be forced upon the American people. Northerns who who felt so strongly to fight for the CSA in New York and elsewhere would take up arms to defend the city with the confederacy orgaizeing a possible army of Manhattan made up of Northerners altamontenterprise.com/05172021/confederate-attic-southern-general-upstate-new-yorksmallstatebighistory.com/im-good-old-rebel-ocean-state-confederates/ The movement would reach out to the merchants who were bringing immigrants to the city as Tammany Hall could earn the support of this movement, which, during the late 1850s, he received before his scandals when he formed a third-party faction known as Mozart Hall. I again remind people the climate of politics would have to be different for this to work, and historically, Davis purchased weapons and other supplies from the north before Fort Sumter. Here are some interesting facts about this scenario: 1. While a reference and not a primary source, it is interesting that the 19th-century novel copperhead, later made into a movie, was written by Harold Fredrick and takes place in upstate New York. As for the town line, while it is mostly a myth, there can be more truth in this alternate history, especially had there been a battle of Bull Run historically or if the CSA had taken DC, which could have militarily happened, although it is a separate discussion if the CSA could have taken dc. If the csa had a bargening chip to get the south to be let go of new york city possibly would separate it the south won a major victory
|
|
|
Post by American hist on Feb 23, 2024 2:20:09 GMT
Interesting fact Holmes, Theophilus H commanded commanding Fort Columbus, which is on Governors Island in New York City, this is advantageous to the Separatist Movement as the general would surrender the fort granting movements much needed supplies. I’m trying to look up the other commanders of the forts but I’m beginning to think that they were held by people you cannot trust. However, to have a major general surrender, is still going to give the Confederates and advantage.
|
|
|
Post by American hist on Feb 25, 2024 20:55:28 GMT
This comes in handy labtisjardim.tripod.com/HarborDefenseMuseum/id52.htm William B. Johns, 3rd Infantry, is the commander at Fort Hamilton; this makes it very feasible another fort could be in confederate hand. (Captain, 3d Infantry, Dec. 4, 1847) Mis., 1848; on frontier duty at San Antonio, Tex., 1848‑49, — March to El Paso, 1849‑50, — Ft. Bliss, Tex., 1850, — San Elizario, Tex., 1850‑51, — Ft. Bliss, Tex., 1851, — Ft. Conrad, N. M., 1851, — Albuquerque, N. M., 1851, — Ft. Defiance, N. M., 1851‑52, — Camp Vigilance, N. M., 1852, — and Ft. Fillmore, N. M., 1853‑56; in garrison at New York harbor, 1856‑59; on frontier duty at Ft. Defiance, N. M., 1859, — Expedition against Tuni-cha Navajo Indians, Nov. 1859, — Ft. Defiance, N. M., 1859‑60, being engaged, Apr. 30, 1860, in the defense of that work against the Navajo Indians, — March to Texas, 1860, — Ringgold Barracks, Tex., 1860‑61, — Ft. Clark, Tex., 1861, — and Ft. Brown, Tex., 1861; and in garrison at Ft. Hamilton, N. Y., 1861. Dropped, Apr. 11, 1861, for "having declined the command of his company, when ordered on a particular service" (to proceed to Ft. Pickens, Fla.). He, however, did not join in the Rebellion against the United States. Residence, Georgetown, D. C.
|
|
|
Post by American hist on Feb 25, 2024 22:35:44 GMT
sunymaritime.libguides.com/ld.php?content_id=67917979Fort Schuyler and the Civil War In the wake of the crises leading to the American Civil War, assigned to the post in January, 1861 Second Lieutenant of the Army Corp of Engineers William Cushing Paine, descendent of Robert Treat Paine, and a signer of the Declaration of Independence was the first 16 commander of Fort Schuyler. However, Paine did not care for the position. He wrote on January 16, “In consequence of all these rumors afloat in the newspapers, Uncle Sam has gotten frightened, and afraid that some New York secessionists may seize the New York Forts, and so has ordered a small garrison to each. They ordered me with ten men here to Fort Schuyler, a fort which has never before had a garrison, nor even a soldier in it. There isn’t a cannon mounted or which can be used in the Fort. It seemed ridiculous to me to come here to defend it, for there is nothing to defend which could be taken away, and I have no means of doing so if it should be attacked. However, I had to obey orders and come.”41 Paine’s ten men were not ideal soldiers. Three of them were transferred as prisoners to Fort Columbus after a court martial and three more including a sergeant, were charged with desertion. Paine’s impatience grew after the outbreak of the war. He wrote on May 7, “I am getting rapidly tired of staying here… I think it is outrageous to keep an Engineering Officer shut up here in charge of 10 Recruits when war is going on.” 42 Finally, in June or July of that year he was reassigned to General Dix’s Department in Baltimore. 43 A bored Union officer who doesn't have hope of defending this minuscule fort still in construction will likely surrender the garrison and, with his hope, be placed somewhere more exciting.So far, Confederate New York or the Free City of Tri-Insula (Tri-Insula is showing promise discalimer This is not a thread bumb because it took a long time to find this information, which I wasn't sure I would receive. ANY more information discovered will be for a different day of research
|
|
|
Post by American hist on Feb 27, 2024 4:17:23 GMT
Fort Tompkins (Staten Island Forts Richmond later changed to (renamed Fort Wadsworth in 1865 add her and battery weed. well I cannot find the commanding officer there seem to be enough union officers that would be of that equivalent captains and lieutenants etc. majors. The outcome would likely be a confederate victory or a secessions movement victory as there are people in the fort who are sympathetic as they are from the south. Fort Hamilton was built to guard fort Lafayette as it was vulnerable from being shelled by land . The confederates or secessionist would only have to have artillery and bombarded fort surrounding by land. Fort Sandy hook and what would eventually be fort Wadsworth cannot find the commanding officer but the forts had southern officers and this minuscule command I believe with a show of force would surrender as there seems to be enough sympathy among the higher ranking officers who have authority to command. Many US officers wanted to surrender the four throughout the very early American chapter of the Civil War, as many of them were sympathetic, or wanted to prevent bloodshed. Most enlisted men were made up of immigrants who were Irish and German beg the civil war. The Arsenal on Governor Island is also In marching distance from Fort Columbus. I’m not sure if the other fort is in the majors command perhaps not. Told you wrong Holmes was not a major general during that time very few were. Of the generals in charge of the eastern department the latter is a Yankee • Bvt. Brig. Gen. James Bankhead 1854–1856(born in Virginia ) * Major. Gen. John E. Wool 1857 – Aug 17, 1861 The good news is the eastern department is all the way in Troy New York probably allowing The possibility of the secessionist to seize federal property.If the separatist are able to take the arsenal they can rightly have the strength to take Brooklyn naval yard. I looked it up the commander of fort Lafayette during the Civil War was only the rank of lieutenant perhaps The lack of federal troops present encourages these rebels
|
|
|
Post by American hist on Feb 27, 2024 21:12:26 GMT
npshistory.com/publications/gois/hrs.pdfBy reading this article, it does appear Holmes is in charge of Governor Island, which holds 2 forts, fort Columbus and Castle Williams. apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA385918.pdfof Fort Lafayette, I think it’s safe to say it was a Southerner in command because after Fort Sumter was attacked, Union officer Abner Doubleday was Placed in charge of command of the fort. I previously mentioned a Hamilton is very close to Fort Lafayette. If the commander of Fort Hamilton wasn’t in charge of Lafayette, then this commander was likely someone who Likely resigned his commission. The other defenses, if you can call it, such as for Sandy, are not in a condition to hold themselves off. The next 2/4 that I believe would be harder to take but are not necessarily very well Defended are Fort Gibson and Fort Wood. npplan.com/parks-by-state/new-york-national-parks/statue-of-liberty-national-monument-park-at-a-glance/statue-of-liberty-national-monument-visiting-ellis-island/statue-of-liberty-national-monument-fort-gibson/Fort Gibson on Elise Island was a gunpowder depot for the forces down in Brooklyn. Because of how they store, use your gunpowder in Brooklyn Navy Yard. It would be too risky during the session crisis. The bottom of the Statue of Liberty, the concrete star, was what Fort Wood looked like. The separatist could seize the gunpowder depot if they had ships with a team of copperheads that could overwhelm any possible amount of guard on that island. The fort is what they have to worry about pretty soon on a nearby island. I might have exaggerated the need to seize Brooklyn island, but I think the separatists would probably not realize it immediately. Because many people didn't take this separation movement seriously, it would be harder to set the fire rather than the fire itself. The enlistment and the southern officers have grounds for spy rings to be set up.
|
|