miletus12
Squadron vice admiral
To get yourself lost, just follow the signs.
Posts: 7,470
Likes: 4,295
|
Post by miletus12 on Mar 14, 2023 1:20:12 GMT
What did the RAN choose for their nuclear submarine?
===============================================================================
We are going to sell 3 Virginia class boats to Australia. That will be around 2030. Then the Australians and British will share a common design submarine for the RN and RAN. Who will design it? I frankly doubt that the British, based on their known troubled submarine history, are able to design a decent boat at all, so that means it will be an American designed boat; not British. The British will build maybe 5 and the Australians will build an unknown number of these "British" boats.
==============================================================================
Despite the claim that the Australian boats will not field "special munitions", there is no way at all that the subs will be guaranteed not to be able to carry the "special munitions". I expect missile tube modules. Missiles (HGVs) can carry conventional explosive packages, or special packages. There would be no way to distinguish. The only way to guarantee non-special munitions is to allow physical inspections.
|
|
miletus12
Squadron vice admiral
To get yourself lost, just follow the signs.
Posts: 7,470
Likes: 4,295
|
Post by miletus12 on Mar 23, 2023 5:09:29 GMT
More AUKUS squawkus...
The situation is not what I originally thought.
|
|
miletus12
Squadron vice admiral
To get yourself lost, just follow the signs.
Posts: 7,470
Likes: 4,295
|
Post by miletus12 on Mar 29, 2023 14:50:59 GMT
AUKUS investments. a. Australia invests 5 billion dollars US in naval base infrastructure. b. AUKUS boats bought and built by Australia will be owned by Australia, according to Doctor Davis. c. Potentially 6 or 7 Virginia boats for Australia. Hopw will these be manned? ============================================================================== Northeast Asia head-knocker exercise to remind the DPRK that they are not going to be allowed. The DPRK fired two ballistic missiles and tested out a new robot drone and tested two cruise new cruise missiles. Tour of USS Nimitz. Russia has been busy in the Sea of Japan firing missiles SSN-22 from a pair of Tarantul. The presenter exaggerates the threat from these oversized speed boats with those cold war era junk missiles.
|
|
miletus12
Squadron vice admiral
To get yourself lost, just follow the signs.
Posts: 7,470
Likes: 4,295
|
Post by miletus12 on Mar 30, 2023 16:37:46 GMT
(^^^) 60 hour endurance shore attack weapon. Pure manure. It showed no guidance, and it showed no endurance as claimed by those liars. (^^^) Cruise missile is a clone of a Russian clone of a Tomahawk. (^^^) Whiskey class sub can fire a 2400 km range ballistic missile.
Nothing new here. Same clowns different days.
|
|
miletus12
Squadron vice admiral
To get yourself lost, just follow the signs.
Posts: 7,470
Likes: 4,295
|
Post by miletus12 on Jun 21, 2023 0:52:39 GMT
1. The presenter is a sonarman, not a submarine subject expert. 2. The idiots who designed the submarine were NOT certified marine system design engineers and technicians. 3. The CEO criminal of this company is liable for the deaths that he caused.
|
|
miletus12
Squadron vice admiral
To get yourself lost, just follow the signs.
Posts: 7,470
Likes: 4,295
|
Post by miletus12 on Jun 22, 2023 19:32:03 GMT
|
|
miletus12
Squadron vice admiral
To get yourself lost, just follow the signs.
Posts: 7,470
Likes: 4,295
|
Post by miletus12 on Jun 22, 2023 23:02:33 GMT
Well to be honest I think its been expected pretty much from the start they were probably dead. Is your assumption of US jurisdiction because the company was registered in the US or something as the nearest country to the death point is Canada?
The lead investigator tends to assume national jurisdiction. I put this news item in this thread because I assume it will be Canada who will be handed this manure sandwich, and because most of the interest parties, who will be suing for justice, are British citizens. The company is based out of the state of Washington, the idiot (who died) chiefly responsible is an American and the survivor who will be sued is this idiot. ====================================================== Now what follows is my personal opinion and is most unpopular with my "woke" friends. If you are a progressive and want to improve society, you can allow some slippage in professional competency when it comes to unimportant technical stuff, like social sciences, fashion design, or popular entertainment. Balance, equity of outcome and improvement of representation among all classes in the Marxist sense of equal outcomes is allowable for social justice. Self-esteem boosting can be a metric for hiring as long as the incompetent people hired to fill out the diversity chart are not allowed near the important stuff in even those "soft sciences". But when it comes to life and death engineering, you do not go "woke". You cannot. You have to hire and KEEP the best in the world. And unfortunately, for those who want "equity", the best in the world for submarines, majorly look like these Anglo-Saxon Cromagnans. David LockridgeNot like this idiot.Erika (Montague) Heine Who pushed the carbon-fiber and plexiglass designed Titan to be built the way it was.
|
|
miletus12
Squadron vice admiral
To get yourself lost, just follow the signs.
Posts: 7,470
Likes: 4,295
|
Post by miletus12 on Jun 22, 2023 23:20:18 GMT
|
|
miletus12
Squadron vice admiral
To get yourself lost, just follow the signs.
Posts: 7,470
Likes: 4,295
|
Post by miletus12 on Jun 23, 2023 3:42:19 GMT
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,832
Likes: 13,222
|
Post by stevep on Jun 23, 2023 10:48:32 GMT
So it sounds like the USN at least suspected that the crew were dead back on Sunday. Its unclear whether/when they passed that to the US Coast Guard and strange that the info was only made public now. We don't really know any details of the facts as to how certain or not the USN were that the disaster was complete on Sunday.
They haven't actually given anyone what they can do. Just given a vague reference to what is possible. Which can deter as much as encourage as it will leave the rest of the world guessing although some nations might be told more.
|
|
miletus12
Squadron vice admiral
To get yourself lost, just follow the signs.
Posts: 7,470
Likes: 4,295
|
Post by miletus12 on Jun 23, 2023 11:25:54 GMT
So it sounds like the USN at least suspected that the crew were dead back on Sunday. Its unclear whether/when they passed that to the US Coast Guard and strange that the info was only made public now. We don't really know any details of the facts as to how certain or not the USN were that the disaster was complete on Sunday.
They haven't actually given anyone what they can do. Just given a vague reference to what is possible. Which can deter as much as encourage as it will leave the rest of the world guessing although some nations might be told more.
1. They have revealed that they have sensors that can hear a beer can implode 900 miles away from Boston three miles underwater and PINPOINT its location within a kilometer of a known wreck site in an environment where noise is so loud, that you need some fancy noise library filters to discriminate between biologicals and mechanicals. 2. The USCG used that triangulation to start their visual search; which is how they found the wreck so quickly and certainly.
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,832
Likes: 13,222
|
Post by stevep on Jun 23, 2023 13:01:36 GMT
So it sounds like the USN at least suspected that the crew were dead back on Sunday. Its unclear whether/when they passed that to the US Coast Guard and strange that the info was only made public now. We don't really know any details of the facts as to how certain or not the USN were that the disaster was complete on Sunday.
They haven't actually given anyone what they can do. Just given a vague reference to what is possible. Which can deter as much as encourage as it will leave the rest of the world guessing although some nations might be told more.
1. They have revealed that they have sensors that can hear a beer can implode 900 miles away from Boston three miles underwater and PINPOINT its location within a kilometer of a known wreck site in an environment where noise is so loud, that you need some fancy noise library filters to discriminate between biologicals and mechanicals. 2. The USCG used that triangulation to start their visual search; which is how they found the wreck so quickly and certainly.
They have revealed they heard something that may have been a submersible imploding. That its ~900 miles from Boston is pretty much irrelevant as the location and nature of the sensors is obviously left unclear.
What an enemy doesn't know is how accurate the statement is and also if largely accurate how easily or not far within the parameters of the US system it was. The latter is important because if that assumed enemy decides the information is accurate and want to make any of their systems secure from detection they have a maximum 'noise' level they need to get under but have no reliable information on what minimum value they need to reach.
Its quite possible, given the delay before announcing this detection, that its a deliberate false trail to make any enemies waste a lot of time and resources trying to make their equipment secure. A bit like the wild goose chase Reagan sent the US on with his SDI programme.
|
|
miletus12
Squadron vice admiral
To get yourself lost, just follow the signs.
Posts: 7,470
Likes: 4,295
|
Post by miletus12 on Jun 23, 2023 13:43:24 GMT
1. They have revealed that they have sensors that can hear a beer can implode 900 miles away from Boston three miles underwater and PINPOINT its location within a kilometer of a known wreck site in an environment where noise is so loud, that you need some fancy noise library filters to discriminate between biologicals and mechanicals. 2. The USCG used that triangulation to start their visual search; which is how they found the wreck so quickly and certainly.
They have revealed they heard something that may have been a submersible imploding. That its ~900 miles from Boston is pretty much irrelevant as the location and nature of the sensors is obviously left unclear.
What an enemy doesn't know is how accurate the statement is and also if largely accurate how easily or not far within the parameters of the US system it was. The latter is important because if that assumed enemy decides the information is accurate and want to make any of their systems secure from detection they have a maximum 'noise' level they need to get under but have no reliable information on what minimum value they need to reach.
Its quite possible, given the delay before announcing this detection, that its a deliberate false trail to make any enemies waste a lot of time and resources trying to make their equipment secure. A bit like the wild goose chase Reagan sent the US on with his SDI programme.
How much do you know about SURTASS? Or to put it yet another way, when the Kursk torpedo detonation occurred and that submarine sank, the USGS heard it all along the US eastern seaboard. It was thought at the time that one of ours had been attacked. We did not know it was an Oscar, until the Russians confessed.
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,832
Likes: 13,222
|
Post by stevep on Jun 23, 2023 14:27:58 GMT
They have revealed they heard something that may have been a submersible imploding. That its ~900 miles from Boston is pretty much irrelevant as the location and nature of the sensors is obviously left unclear.
What an enemy doesn't know is how accurate the statement is and also if largely accurate how easily or not far within the parameters of the US system it was. The latter is important because if that assumed enemy decides the information is accurate and want to make any of their systems secure from detection they have a maximum 'noise' level they need to get under but have no reliable information on what minimum value they need to reach.
Its quite possible, given the delay before announcing this detection, that its a deliberate false trail to make any enemies waste a lot of time and resources trying to make their equipment secure. A bit like the wild goose chase Reagan sent the US on with his SDI programme.
How much do you know about SURTASS? Or to put it yet another way, when the Kursk torpedo detonation occurred and that submarine sank, the USGS heard it all along the US eastern seaboard. It was thought at the time that one of ours had been attacked. We did not know it was an Oscar, until the Russians confessed.
Not technical details but then I don't need to. My point is that any such 'leak' of information as you suggest in the present case - unless it is a capacity that they already believe the USN already has - is a problem for the suggested enemy state/s.
|
|
miletus12
Squadron vice admiral
To get yourself lost, just follow the signs.
Posts: 7,470
Likes: 4,295
|
Post by miletus12 on Jun 23, 2023 16:32:27 GMT
How much do you know about SURTASS? Or to put it yet another way, when the Kursk torpedo detonation occurred and that submarine sank, the USGS heard it all along the US eastern seaboard. It was thought at the time that one of ours had been attacked. We did not know it was an Oscar, until the Russians confessed.
Not technical details but then I don't need to. My point is that any such 'leak' of information as you suggest in the present case - unless it is a capacity that they already believe the USN already has - is a problem for the suggested enemy state/s.
You should be aware that any information that confirms limits and characteristics is valuable to an enemy. We should not have revealed that we could track submarines by seismograph in 2000 but not identify them. This latest mistake allows the Chinese to figure out threshold detection sensitivity and how to defeat it.
|
|