forcon
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 988
Likes: 1,739
|
Post by forcon on Feb 25, 2019 11:37:16 GMT
Fifty-NineRussian forces were closing in on the capital of Latvia. Latvian President Valdis Zatlers was still in Riga while his country was being attacked. An underground facility beneath the Defence Ministry was being used to brief President Zatlers. As well as numerous aids and security staff, two other senior figures in the Latvian government were there. Both Minister of Defence Imants Liegis and Commander of the National Armed Forces Lieutenant-General Raimonds Graube were with Zatlers as the lights started to flicker and the sound of explosions rumbled in. There were soldiers of the Latvian National Guard outside the building, and armed police officers as well. Although they all wanted to be proud of their nations’ armed forces, Zatlers, Liegis & Graube all new that the end was nigh. This had been anticipated and plans for the military to go underground and form the core of a resistance movement were ordered to be put into place. Concern now fell to the fates of those individuals on a personal level. Latvia was succumbing to enemy occupation and there were Russian paratroopers outside the capital. The head of government and the leaders of the armed forces couldn’t allow themselves to be captured alive by Russian forces. Lieutenant-General Graube new this and he wore a sidearm on his hip for that very reason; however, like Zatlers and Liegis, Graube very much preferred the idea of surviving to see his country be liberated once again. NATO new all of this information. It was being fed directly to SACEUR’s airborne command post and to political leaders in many NATO nations as well. Alongside the Latvian government members were several ambassadors and diplomatic staff from the UK, Holland, Portugal and Romania. Those personnel had made their way to the Latvian Defence Ministry, keeping in contact with their home nations as they moved. It wouldn’t be long before Russian soldiers were kicking down the doors of the Defence Ministry and dragging all of these senior figures out in cuffs. Both for political propaganda purposes and to a lesser extend for military reasons, this couldn’t be allowed to happen. The Lithuanian governments’ fate had already been sealed with many of its members trapped in the surrounded Vilnius, and the Estonian government was already missing, presumed killed or captured. However, there was still a chance to save that beacon of Latvia’s democracy. A complicated and short-notice special operations mission was put into effect to rescue Zatlers and his comrades. Zatlers, Liegis & Graube, the three ‘principals’ of the Latvian government, along with those diplomats from the myriad of other NATO countries, were moved by a Latvian security team into a small fleet of inconspicuous-looking civilian vehicles and then driven rapidly out of the city with only hours to go before the net was sealed and Riga was surrounded on all sides. Heavy NATO airstrikes covered this daring escape; the strikes would have been launched regardless, but their occurrence made the escape of the Latvian government a legitimate possibility rather than a pipe dream. Enough time was bought for Zatlers and his companions to get away. Speeding down country roads after leaving the city, the Latvians made it to a pre-arranged pick-up-point hidden in the dense woodlands of the coastal Kemeru National Park. A C-130J Hercules transport aircraft from the RAF’s No.47 Squadron, a unit dedicated to special ops, flew in low over the coast, pulling up at the last second. That aircraft was shielded by numerous American F-16s which drew fire away from it. A twelve-man team of commandos from Britain’s Special Boat Service parachuted from the back of the C-130, landing in the Kemeru National Park. The British commandos – accompanied by a translator from the Secret Intelligence Service who had, in his own words, “not signed up for this bollocks” – linked up with the Latvians and the NATO diplomats as well as their security staff. Russian forces were closing in behind them quickly. On foot, they scrambled through the thick woodlands, tumbling and falling every other step in a headlong dash for the coastline. They emerged from the treeline and onto the beach, where four more SBS men waited with a pair of inflatable motorboats. They weren’t out of the woods yet though, at least not literally. Russian soldiers from a reconnaissance company belonging to the 23rd Guards Air Assault Regiment were close behind. They opened fire from the woodlands as the British and the Latvians raced towards their inflatable boat. The SBS team and the Latvian security men returned fire, pouring down covering fire and allowing the principals to clamber into the dinghy. The Captain commanding the SBS detachment remained behind on the beach along with several of his men, holding off the Russian paratroopers and buying time for their charges to get away. This sacrifice would be honoured for generations in British military history, regarded as a stand similar to that of Rourke’s Drift even though it had really been a small engagement in what would be a very big war indeed. The inflatable craft carried the Latvians and the SBS troopers – men who would be truly broken by leaving their comrades behind – further out to sea. They were picked up by a vessel of the Royal Norwegian Navy. The submarine HMNS Ula was waiting in the Baltic Sea. Her crewmember helped the shaken Latvians and the British commandos aboard. They would probably have preferred being further north, fighting off the Russian forces that were invading their own country, but their orders were to fight where they had been stationed before war had broken out, and they would do so. The rescue of the Latvian President and his closest military advisors was a small and costly victory in what was shaping up to be a day of defeats for NATO. * The first press briefing of the war took place within the Pentagon itself on the evening of August 7th. Ever since the First Gulf War, the press had demanded access to the frontlines. Many in military circles resented them for this and wanted journalists to stay far away from the battlefield. There were concerns with this briefing over the potential of secrets being revealed by accident and even paranoia amongst a few DOD officials that some journalists might be enemy spies or terrorists. Those journalists being admitted into the building found themselves facing an unusual amount of scrutiny, and were watched by eager-eyed National Guardsmen in full ‘battle-rattle’, carrying M4 Carbines. This extraordinary amount of security was a reflection of anxious and angry mood that resonated nationwide. The Joint Chiefs of Staff and many of the Pentagon’s planners had been relocated to Site R already, leaving a relatively small number of people actually at the building. President Biden himself ordered that a military briefing take place after he himself addressed the nation. The DOD was mostly truthful with the American people. Mostly. The Russian commando strikes and the air & cruise missile attacks were told as truth, as was the fact that NATO forces were conducting what was being called a “tactical withdrawal” in Poland and the desperate situation in all three of the Baltic States. Victories in Norway and at sea were touted. However, the Pentagon briefer, when asked about the fate of the brigade of American paratroopers stationed in Estonia, denied that that formation had been destroyed. He told the enterprising Huffington Post reporter that contact had been temporarily lost with the brigade headquarters due to Russian jamming and electronic warfare, but that the Falcon Brigade was still fighting and slowing the Russian advance on Tallinn. This was a falsehood and the Department of Defence new it. Those 4,400 American soldiers were now all either dead, POWs, or on the run. Nobody wanted to admit that at the time though; a US military defeat on such a scale was unheard of since the Korean War. Even in Vietnam, whole brigades hadn’t simply been swallowed up by an enemy advance like 2/82nd Airborne had. It would not be any American journalist that exposed the truth, but rather a British one. Almost immediately after 2/82nd had formally surrendered, the officers and enlisted personnel with technical knowledge were separated from the others and taken off for interrogation, while most prisoners, after being searched, were marched off to holing camps further east. Some of those soldiers were forced to make appearances on television, and, at gunpoint, many told of how their whole brigade had been annihilated. They weren’t traitors because of doing this; many were wounded and under the influence of strong painkillers and others had been beaten and threatened into talking to Russian cameramen. Russia Today & RIA Novosti were blocked in most NATO countries by the time war broke out, with that being done under the authority of many emergency powers laws. Despite efforts to prevent it from getting out, the whole thing ended up online very quickly and then major Western news channels caught wind of it. The BBC aired a report about the whole fiasco and that was quickly caught onto by the major American news networks. The Pentagon would soon confirm this as the truth; the DOD stated that there had been a mistake with the briefing and that there had been no intention for a lie to be told. There were other issues domestically with a number of anti-Moscow riots and protests taking place outside Russian consulates and embassies nationwide. In DC, thousands of people gathered outside the Russian embassy chanting for its members to be arrested, or in some cases, lynched in the streets. The Metropolitan Police Department sought to contain the disruption, but the Russians were ordered out of the United States, given just twenty-four hours to leave the country or face arrest. In Seattle, the small Russian consulate there came under fire when one individual – not part of an organised group – shot at the building with a hunting rifle. He was able to fire several rounds, none of which caused any casualties, before being apprehended by the police. Many onlookers jeered and booed the officers who arrested the shooter. People burned effigies of Putin that night and a number of Russian-owned businesses were torched across the US. In a few cases, local police departments were hesitant to conduct proper investigations, leading to the FBI announcing that it would pursue and prosecute those involved in attacks on innocent Russians to the fullest extent of the law.
|
|
|
Post by redrobin65 on Feb 25, 2019 12:30:02 GMT
The escape of the Latvian President reminds me of the scene from Hunter Killer where the Russian President was rescued by Navy SEALs.
|
|
DavidR
Seaman
Posts: 7
Likes: 13
|
Post by DavidR on Feb 25, 2019 12:51:44 GMT
I had myself been wondering about the internet during wartime, especially given what have seen OTL about propaganda online. Facebook and Twitter were already in business by 2010, too. In previous wars, postal service was interrupted between the two sides. And private citizens on opposite sides can still communicate.
Looking forward to the next post!
|
|
crackpot
Petty Officer 1st Class
Posts: 89
Likes: 71
|
Post by crackpot on Feb 25, 2019 13:20:33 GMT
I had myself been wondering about the internet during wartime, especially given what have seen OTL about propaganda online. Facebook and Twitter were already in business by 2010, too. In previous wars, postal service was interrupted between the two sides. And private citizens on opposite sides can still communicate. Looking forward to the next post! I would imagine a no holds barred assault on the internet by Russia. Banks, media, universities, utilities, everything.
|
|
James G
Squadron vice admiral
Posts: 7,608
Likes: 8,833
|
Post by James G on Feb 25, 2019 13:36:17 GMT
Internet insanity is something I aim to add in tonight's update. In the Kremlin they'll be watching youtube footage and congratulating themselves on their own brilliance. Right before it turns around and bites them? Now that would be a sad story indeed.
|
|
James G
Squadron vice admiral
Posts: 7,608
Likes: 8,833
|
Post by James G on Feb 25, 2019 13:39:39 GMT
The escape of the Latvian President reminds me of the scene from Hunter Killer where the Russian President was rescued by Navy SEALs. Forcon has done very well here with this! I had myself been wondering about the internet during wartime, especially given what have seen OTL about propaganda online. Facebook and Twitter were already in business by 2010, too. In previous wars, postal service was interrupted between the two sides. And private citizens on opposite sides can still communicate. Looking forward to the next post! Yep, this aspect of modern life shall make things rather interesting. Tonight. I would imagine a no holds barred assault on the internet by Russia. Banks, media, universities, utilities, everything. They've had a good already and causes some issues, though as the UKGov was told, it didn't look over yet.
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 68,086
Likes: 49,472
|
Post by lordroel on Feb 25, 2019 15:03:22 GMT
Fifty-NineRussian forces were closing in on the capital of Latvia. Latvian President Valdis Zatlers was still in Riga while his country was being attacked. An underground facility beneath the Defence Ministry was being used to brief President Zatlers. As well as numerous aids and security staff, two other senior figures in the Latvian government were there. Both Minister of Defence Imants Liegis and Commander of the National Armed Forces Lieutenant-General Raimonds Graube were with Zatlers as the lights started to flicker and the sound of explosions rumbled in. There were soldiers of the Latvian National Guard outside the building, and armed police officers as well. Although they all wanted to be proud of their nations’ armed forces, Zatlers, Liegis & Graube all new that the end was nigh. This had been anticipated and plans for the military to go underground and form the core of a resistance movement were ordered to be put into place. Concern now fell to the fates of those individuals on a personal level. Latvia was succumbing to enemy occupation and there were Russian paratroopers outside the capital. The head of government and the leaders of the armed forces couldn’t allow themselves to be captured alive by Russian forces. Lieutenant-General Graube new this and he wore a sidearm on his hip for that very reason; however, like Zatlers and Liegis, Graube very much preferred the idea of surviving to see his country be liberated once again. NATO new all of this information. It was being fed directly to SACEUR’s airborne command post and to political leaders in many NATO nations as well. Alongside the Latvian government members were several ambassadors and diplomatic staff from the UK, Holland, Portugal and Romania. Those personnel had made their way to the Latvian Defence Ministry, keeping in contact with their home nations as they moved. It wouldn’t be long before Russian soldiers were kicking down the doors of the Defence Ministry and dragging all of these senior figures out in cuffs. Both for political propaganda purposes and to a lesser extend for military reasons, this couldn’t be allowed to happen. The Lithuanian governments’ fate had already been sealed with many of its members trapped in the surrounded Vilnius, and the Estonian government was already missing, presumed killed or captured. However, there was still a chance to save that beacon of Latvia’s democracy. A complicated and short-notice special operations mission was put into effect to rescue Zatlers and his comrades. Zatlers, Liegis & Graube, the three ‘principals’ of the Latvian government, along with those diplomats from the myriad of other NATO countries, were moved by a Latvian security team into a small fleet of inconspicuous-looking civilian vehicles and then driven rapidly out of the city with only hours to go before the net was sealed and Riga was surrounded on all sides. Heavy NATO airstrikes covered this daring escape; the strikes would have been launched regardless, but their occurrence made the escape of the Latvian government a legitimate possibility rather than a pipe dream. Enough time was bought for Zatlers and his companions to get away. Speeding down country roads after leaving the city, the Latvians made it to a pre-arranged pick-up-point hidden in the dense woodlands of the coastal Kemeru National Park. A C-130J Hercules transport aircraft from the RAF’s No.47 Squadron, a unit dedicated to special ops, flew in low over the coast, pulling up at the last second. That aircraft was shielded by numerous American F-16s which drew fire away from it. A twelve-man team of commandos from Britain’s Special Boat Service parachuted from the back of the C-130, landing in the Kemeru National Park. The British commandos – accompanied by a translator from the Secret Intelligence Service who had, in his own words, “not signed up for this bollocks” – linked up with the Latvians and the NATO diplomats as well as their security staff. Russian forces were closing in behind them quickly. On foot, they scrambled through the thick woodlands, tumbling and falling every other step in a headlong dash for the coastline. They emerged from the treeline and onto the beach, where four more SBS men waited with a pair of inflatable motorboats. They weren’t out of the woods yet though, at least not literally. Russian soldiers from a reconnaissance company belonging to the 23rd Guards Air Assault Regiment were close behind. They opened fire from the woodlands as the British and the Latvians raced towards their inflatable boat. The SBS team and the Latvian security men returned fire, pouring down covering fire and allowing the principals to clamber into the dinghy. The Captain commanding the SBS detachment remained behind on the beach along with several of his men, holding off the Russian paratroopers and buying time for their charges to get away. This sacrifice would be honoured for generations in British military history, regarded as a stand similar to that of Rourke’s Drift even though it had really been a small engagement in what would be a very big war indeed. The inflatable craft carried the Latvians and the SBS troopers – men who would be truly broken by leaving their comrades behind – further out to sea. They were picked up by a vessel of the Royal Norwegian Navy. The submarine HMNS Ula was waiting in the Baltic Sea. Her crewmember helped the shaken Latvians and the British commandos aboard. They would probably have preferred being further north, fighting off the Russian forces that were invading their own country, but their orders were to fight where they had been stationed before war had broken out, and they would do so. The rescue of the Latvian President and his closest military advisors was a small and costly victory in what was shaping up to be a day of defeats for NATO. * The first press briefing of the war took place within the Pentagon itself on the evening of August 7th. Ever since the First Gulf War, the press had demanded access to the frontlines. Many in military circles resented them for this and wanted journalists to stay far away from the battlefield. There were concerns with this briefing over the potential of secrets being revealed by accident and even paranoia amongst a few DOD officials that some journalists might be enemy spies or terrorists. Those journalists being admitted into the building found themselves facing an unusual amount of scrutiny, and were watched by eager-eyed National Guardsmen in full ‘battle-rattle’, carrying M4 Carbines. This extraordinary amount of security was a reflection of anxious and angry mood that resonated nationwide. The Joint Chiefs of Staff and many of the Pentagon’s planners had been relocated to Site R already, leaving a relatively small number of people actually at the building. President Biden himself ordered that a military briefing take place after he himself addressed the nation. The DOD was mostly truthful with the American people. Mostly. The Russian commando strikes and the air & cruise missile attacks were told as truth, as was the fact that NATO forces were conducting what was being called a “tactical withdrawal” in Poland and the desperate situation in all three of the Baltic States. Victories in Norway and at sea were touted. However, the Pentagon briefer, when asked about the fate of the brigade of American paratroopers stationed in Estonia, denied that that formation had been destroyed. He told the enterprising Huffington Post reporter that contact had been temporarily lost with the brigade headquarters due to Russian jamming and electronic warfare, but that the Falcon Brigade was still fighting and slowing the Russian advance on Tallinn. This was a falsehood and the Department of Defence new it. Those 4,400 American soldiers were now all either dead, POWs, or on the run. Nobody wanted to admit that at the time though; a US military defeat on such a scale was unheard of since the Korean War. Even in Vietnam, whole brigades hadn’t simply been swallowed up by an enemy advance like 2/82nd Airborne had. It would not be any American journalist that exposed the truth, but rather a British one. Almost immediately after 2/82nd had formally surrendered, the officers and enlisted personnel with technical knowledge were separated from the others and taken off for interrogation, while most prisoners, after being searched, were marched off to holing camps further east. Some of those soldiers were forced to make appearances on television, and, at gunpoint, many told of how their whole brigade had been annihilated. They weren’t traitors because of doing this; many were wounded and under the influence of strong painkillers and others had been beaten and threatened into talking to Russian cameramen. Russia Today & RIA Novosti were blocked in most NATO countries by the time war broke out, with that being done under the authority of many emergency powers laws. Despite efforts to prevent it from getting out, the whole thing ended up online very quickly and then major Western news channels caught wind of it. The BBC aired a report about the whole fiasco and that was quickly caught onto by the major American news networks. The Pentagon would soon confirm this as the truth; the DOD stated that there had been a mistake with the briefing and that there had been no intention for a lie to be told. There were other issues domestically with a number of anti-Moscow riots and protests taking place outside Russian consulates and embassies nationwide. In DC, thousands of people gathered outside the Russian embassy chanting for its members to be arrested, or in some cases, lynched in the streets. The Metropolitan Police Department sought to contain the disruption, but the Russians were ordered out of the United States, given just twenty-four hours to leave the country or face arrest. In Seattle, the small Russian consulate there came under fire when one individual – not part of an organised group – shot at the building with a hunting rifle. He was able to fire several rounds, none of which caused any casualties, before being apprehended by the police. Many onlookers jeered and booed the officers who arrested the shooter. People burned effigies of Putin that night and a number of Russian-owned businesses were torched across the US. In a few cases, local police departments were hesitant to conduct proper investigations, leading to the FBI announcing that it would pursue and prosecute those involved in attacks on innocent Russians to the fullest extent of the law. Good update forcon, seems the Russian commandos are busy.
|
|
Dan
Warrant Officer
Posts: 258
Likes: 185
|
Post by Dan on Feb 25, 2019 15:41:57 GMT
(These have been approved by forcon) These are some of the citations for awards from the opening days of the fighting. The QUEEN has been graciously pleased to approve the award of the Conspicuous Gallantry Cross to the undermentioned: Sergeant Andrew Harris, 3rd Battalion The Parachute Regiment 7th and 9th August 2010 Zealand On 7th August 2010, Sergeant Harris led his men in one of the first combat drops by the Parachute Regiment since the Korean War. Upon landing, Sgt Harris and his section came under immediate heavy and accurate fire from enemy forces. Showing great initiative and calmness under fire, Sgt Harris gathered his men into a defensible position, and began to return fire. On three occasions, Sgt Harris left the safety of his own position to guide other members of the Parachute Regiment company towards their position. This action created a strong point of resistance and allowed for a concentration of strength in actions partaken later that day. On the 9th August, Sergeant Harris led his men on a patrol towards the village of Jersie, near Havdrup. The planned patrol ended after Sgt Harris' section discovered a strong enemy force on the eastern outskirts of the village. Unawares of Sgt Harris' patrol, the enemy force began to move westwards towards British positions. Showing great presence of mind, and coolness under a very difficult situation, radioed a number of warnings back to Company HQ allowing the Men of 2 Company, 3rd Battalion The Parachute Regiment to meet the enemy force in Battle. Sgt Harris' patrol were discovered and became involved in a heavy firefight with significantly greater forces. Sgt Harris called in fire support very close to his own position, at times having to stand exposed to enemy fire to call in updates, before returning to his company position, suffering no casualties in the process. After battle examination determined that Sgt Harris' actions that night, prevented approximately 2 companies of enemy solders from attacking British positions and thus gaining a tactical advantage. His actions on the 8th & 9th of August, showed conspicuous gallantry in the face of enemy action and had a significant impact on the outcome on later military operations, going beyond the call of his expected duty and upholding the proud traditions of the Parachute Regiment and the British Army. Sergeant Andrew Harris is awarded by order of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, the Conspicuous Gallantry Cross, this day - 28th February 2012.
|
|
James G
Squadron vice admiral
Posts: 7,608
Likes: 8,833
|
Post by James G on Feb 25, 2019 20:08:43 GMT
(These have been approved by forcon ) These are some of the citations for awards from the opening days of the fighting. Sergeant Andrew Harris, 3rd Battalion The Parachute Regiment 7th and 9th August 2010 Zealand On 7th August 2010, Sergeant Harris led his men in one of the first combat drops by the Parachute Regiment since the Korean War. Upon landing, Sgt Harris and his section came under immediate heavy and accurate fire from enemy forces. Showing great initiative and calmness under fire, Sgt Harris gathered his men into a defensible position, and began to return fire. On three occasions, Sgt Harris left the safety of his own position to guide other members of the Parachute Regiment company towards their position. This action created a strong point of resistance and allowed for a concentration of strength in actions partaken later that day. On the 9th August, Sergeant Harris led his men on a patrol towards the village of Jersie, near Havdrup. The planned patrol ended after Sgt Harris' section discovered a strong enemy force on the eastern outskirts of the village. Unawares of Sgt Harris' patrol, the enemy force began to move westwards towards British positions. Showing great presence of mind, and coolness under a very difficult situation, radioed a number of warnings back to Company HQ allowing the Men of 2 Company, 3rd Battalion The Parachute Regiment to meet the enemy force in Battle. Sgt Harris' patrol were discovered and became involved in a heavy firefight with significantly greater forces. Sgt Harris called in fire support very close to his own position, at times having to stand exposed to enemy fire to call in updates, before returning to his company position, suffering no casualties in the process. After battle examination determined that Sgt Harris' actions that night, prevented approximately 2 companies of enemy solders from attacking British positions and thus gaining a tactical advantage. His actions on the 8th & 9th of August, showed conspicuous gallantry in the face of enemy action and had a significant impact on the outcome on later military operations, going beyond the call of his expected duty and upholding the proud traditions of the Parachute Regiment and the British Army. Sergeant Andrew Harris is awarded by order of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, the Conspicuous Gallantry Cross, this day - 31st August 2010. Thank you for this. This is just brilliant.
|
|
James G
Squadron vice admiral
Posts: 7,608
Likes: 8,833
|
Post by James G on Feb 25, 2019 20:09:34 GMT
Sixty
Despite everything which had happened since the late summer of 2008, and especially throughout this summer too, there remained Westerners inside Russia. These were from NATO countries and those traditionally associated with ‘the West’. Ambassadors and the majority of diplomatic staffs had been pulled out long before the war began. There were travel advisory notices – even outright bans from some countries – when it came to visiting Russia to say nothing of how difficult Russia had made matters with visa requirements. Things had been getting tense inside the country for Westerners with harassment from unofficial elements of the Russian state – teens with Nashi – berating them in the street for the attitude of their home governments. Regardless, there were a good few thousand within the borders of Russia at the outbreak of war. The Russian government had a good idea where to find most of them. They had been forced to register their hotels or places of residence with the police since the middle of July. Once the war started, efforts were made to detain these people. Russia wanted them in custody but not to hold them as hostages to use them as bargaining chips with the West. Instead, it was to expel them from the country. This would be done ‘politely’ too. There was a propaganda war alongside a shooting war. Russia would play by its own rules and do things which it thought would play out well – whether they would or not was to be seen – and that included removing Westerners from their country. For their own safety, they were told, foreign civilians were asked to report to police stations nationwide. They then began their journey out of the country with Russian intending to sent them out through neighbouring countries like Finland, the Ukraine and Turkey: whichever would agree to aid Russia in this. They weren’t robbed, beaten or overtly treated badly but they were firmly removed from Russia starting on the war’s first day. Public announcements were made directed at those who hadn’t yet done so to report to the police as well as urging Russians to remember their patriotic duty and assist such people in leaving the country… that second bit concerned many Westerners who heard translations of such a remark. There were those diplomatic compounds too. Consulates and consulates-general outside of Moscow in many cities were already closed but there remained embassies in the capital. Such places had few high-ranking staff left working there and for some time now, Russian nationals employed at them hadn’t been into work. Moscow police and even FSB personnel in uniform were around them all throughout the extensive period of crisis. Those FSB officers, joined now by people from the Foreign Ministry, entered the compounds. There were ‘incidents’ at several including the American and French embassies where threats were made of shooting. This eventually didn’t occur though and such places were taken over by the Russian state without violence. Diplomats were told that they were being expelled from Russia and with immediate effect. For the US Marine guards at the American embassy, their fellow US Marines were fighting elsewhere in the world though here in Moscow they were instructed by their senior diplomat present to put down their weapons, leave their posts with him and see the embassy taken over without a shot being fired. Heroic and suicidal stands for no reason weren’t going to take place.
There was quite the disturbance inside the Kremlin. Fradkov and General Shlyakhturov – the heads of the SVR and the GRU respectively – almost came to physical blows during a meeting of the Security Council. Some of the others present pretended to be shocked and outraged at such a protocol violation yet secretly were rooting for fisticuffs between the two men. Why did their verbal argument nearly turn to violence? It was because Hillary Clinton was dead. The SVR’s intelligence-gathering operations deemed the ‘Chappaqua Connection’ came to an unexpected end because the GRU had assassinated her alongside Obama and the others in Marine One. No more would intelligence of the highest quality coming from the American secretary of state be available for Russian exploitation. The line was dead there, Fradkov said. Shlyakhturov shrugged his soldiers. He’d told Putin and the others that she hadn’t been targeted directly as Obama was the priority target but there was more benefit from her death than loss to Russia. The Americans would be on their knees in tears at the loss of so many important people; she too was an enemy of Russia who would have gladly seen all those here in the Kremlin hung from lampposts in the streets from the mob. He also mocked Fradkov and asked whether he would be on his knees crying for her too. Bortnikov got physically in the way of the two men and then Patrushev called for order and respect… especially in the presence of the president. Eyes turned to Putin, glaring at them as was his way, and those up on their feet sat back down. Shlyakhturov ignored Fradkov and moved to talk about all of the successes that the GRU had had with their specialist operations elsewhere too. There was plenty of report and all of it was framed as success. This came as part of a longer briefing given to the Security Council by others as well. Those gathered inside the Kremlin – ready to evacuate at a moment’s notice if necessary – to hear the series of military briefings were treated to news similar to what the GRU head had said. Russia’s armed forces had had a good day. There had been some reverses met, of which details were provided, but these were few and not that severe when it came to the overall aim of the conflict sought. Russia, those present were told, had started the war as it would go on: with victory.
Russia hadn’t embraced the internet like the West had – it was invented over there to be fair – yet neither was it something ignored. Its uses were exploited though there was often a refusal at the highest levels to go all the way. It was something seen as dangerous, something which couldn’t be controlled. All of that information, all of that means of unchecked communication… The internet was a weapon though. Cyber warfare was something understood in Russia. They’d witnessed it done to others and used it themselves. Any notion in the West that Russia was behind the curve here was shown to be entirely false with actions undertaken to conduct cyber-attacks at the outbreak of fighting. More of these were due to come too past the opening strikes. There was the possibility that the West would take the step of activating ‘kill switches’ to their internet services (less dramatic than it sounded; telecommunications companies could be ordered to cut services rather than someone with a Big Red Button) but before then, what damage would be done would be. As to those other aspects of the internet, Russia was monitoring them ahead of the fighting commencing and once it did so as well. Information was sought through systems broken into yet also open-source means. The latter were social media platforms. There were intelligence-gathering assets instructed to exploit these looking for avenues to aid the war effort. Unfortunately, they were suddenly overwhelmed. There was so much information out there and the useful stuff was hidden among that. The big websites for internet communications used across the West were alight with comments and media. It would take hundreds, maybe thousands of years to go through all of this and that would be far too late! Russia just wasn’t in a position to exploit what there was out there. The reaction which came online to the outbreak of war filled websites with so much of use yet all drowned out by what really wasn’t. Social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter weren’t able to be used like Russia wanted them to be done to gather information. Youtube, the video sharing platform which was growing faster than many had expected in recent months following the period of international crisis and civilians in the West uploading content, was more useful than the others. Russia had watched pre-war as it was filled with ‘citizen journalists’ filming military deployments and security measures to post them online for friends and strangers to watch. Once the war started, these increased. People put themselves in grave danger in doing so; Russia was ever so grateful for this! One senior GRU officer made a throwaway remark to his colleagues that in the future, this conflict might be called the ‘Youtube War’. You never know… Videos titled such as ‘Russian parachutists landing in Sweden’, ‘Croydon Looting’, ‘Putin killed my Mum’ and ‘Look at all those cars!’ were online. These four examples concerned footage of two aircrew who had ejected from a downed Russian fighter reaching the ground in Sweden (and being detained by the Swedes), a wave of looting of shops taking place in South London by criminal youths, a video of a woman lying dead in the street in Copenhagen with her daughter crying while describing what had happened and traffic jams at a border crossing on the US-Mexico frontier where it was closed. These were just a very few of oh so many. The footage wasn’t that great. There were grainy, jumpy images and more talk than action. Those watching actually saw very little. Another video entitled ‘News chopper down over D.C.’ sparked GRU interest: there was footage of a helicopter crash moments after it had come down in the American capital with the man who recorded it believing then and afterwards that he had filmed a media helicopter on the ground & alight. Only later did he realise that it was Marine One on the ground and once that was revealed, viewership rates for his video were astronomical. Russian operatives watched these videos. They saw others too with images of fighting taking place in Denmark, Norway and Poland. Further military deployments were recorded from afar and posted online too with no one stopping this. However, among all of these goldmines of intelligence, there was once again plenty of chaff to wade through. People recorded video diaries of what they said where their final moments as they waited for ‘the bomb’ to fall… and waited. There were those too who repeated rumours and falsehoods: some stupid people even made fake propaganda purporting to be from inside Russia claiming that the West was about to fall and the end of the neo-liberal order was about to be ended with Russian tanks taking over Berlin, Paris, London and even Washington. It was madness, pure insanity!
Russia’s worldwide allies did what Serbia had done and refused to enter the war against the West. Serbia had said no when it came to the matter of Kosovo and this was the same with those who could be considered as far closer to Moscow than Belgrade was. In Caracas, Damascus, Havana, Pyongyang, Tehran and Tripoli, these opponents of the West declined to go to war as well. The regimes in each weren’t about to join in the conflict that Russia was involved in. Hesitation had been expected by those in the Kremlin but they instead got a rude surprise when they received a series of rejections to their suggestions that the time was ripe for them to strike. The military briefings which the leadership received on the course of the war had brought much assurance of ultimate victory but that was then tempered off by the news which kept coming in from elsewhere where those countries were staying out. Were Russia and Belarus going to remain all alone in this war? They didn’t need others, did they?
End of Part Three
|
|
forcon
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 988
Likes: 1,739
|
Post by forcon on Feb 25, 2019 20:34:21 GMT
Nice work.
Part Four tomorrow.
Ever wondered what the aftermath of M1A2s fighting T-90MS's looks like? You'll soon find out.
|
|
Dan
Warrant Officer
Posts: 258
Likes: 185
|
Post by Dan on Feb 25, 2019 21:26:10 GMT
Another citation from the 3 PARA landing.
The QUEEN has been graciously pleased to approve the award of the Victoria Cross to the undermentioned: Corporal Dalvindar Singh, 144 Parachute Medical Squadron (TA), 16 Close Support Medical Regiment 7th August 2010 Zealand
Corporal Singh took part in the Parachute drop in the vicinity of Havdrup on 7th August 2010. Before they had landed, members of Cpl Singh's section had become casualties and upon landing, he immediately began to give medical treatment to those around him before moving them into a position of relative safety. During the course of the battle, Cpl Singh repeatedly left cover at great personal risk, to provide emergency medical treatment to fallen comrades and recover vital medical supplies that would otherwise have been lost to enemy action.
At approximately 2pm on the afternoon of 8th August 2010, Cpl Singh received notification of a group of casualties on one of the lower slopes of the surrounding hills. Pausing only to ensure that his medical supplies were complete, Cpl Singh went out into open ground, exposed to enemy rifle and rocket fire, crossing nearly 400 meters to reach the casualties. Upon his arrival at the site, he found that while two of the group had sustained minor injuries and could return on their own accord under covering fire, one of the casualties could not due to the seriousness of his wounds. Cpl Singh treated the man's wounds then carried him, single handed back across the open ground to friendly positions. During this return, one of the previous casualties had been hit again and lay in an exposed position. Cpl Singh returned to the casualty, placing his own body between the casualty and the enemy fire in order to render medical assistance. It was during this, that Corporal Singh was struck multiple times by enemy machine gun fire, grievously wounding him. Despite this, Corporal Singh remained with his body shielding the casualty until they were recovered by members of the Parachute Regiment. While Corporal Singh later died of his wounds, the treated casualty survived.
By his actions, displaying exceptional valour in the face of overwhelming enemy fire, placing himself in extreme danger to rescue British soldiers wounded in action, Corporal Dalvinder Singh upheld the very highest traditions of the Royal Army Medical Corps, sacrificing his own life so that others may live, while personifying the Corps motto - In Arduis Fedilis, "Steadfast In Adversity", he inspired many subsequent acts of bravery during this engagement, Corporal Dalvinder Singh is thoroughly deserving of this significant award.
|
|
forcon
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 988
Likes: 1,739
|
Post by forcon on Feb 25, 2019 21:57:03 GMT
Another citation from the 3 PARA landing. Corporal Dalvindar Singh, 144 Parachute Medical Squadron (TA), 16 Close Support Medical Regiment 7th August 2010 Zealand Corporal Singh took part in the Parachute drop in the vicinity of Havdrup on 7th August 2010. Before they had landed, members of Cpl Singh's section had become casualties and upon landing, he immediately began to give medical treatment to those around him before moving them into a position of relative safety. During the course of the battle, Cpl Singh repeatedly left cover at great personal risk, to provide emergency medical treatment to fallen comrades and recover vital medical supplies that would otherwise have been lost to enemy action. At approximately 2pm on the afternoon of 8th August 2010, Cpl Singh received notification of a group of casualties on one of the lower slopes of the surrounding hills. Pausing only to ensure that his medical supplies were complete, Cpl Singh went out into open ground, exposed to enemy rifle and rocket fire, crossing nearly 400 meters to reach the casualties. Upon his arrival at the site, he found that while two of the group had sustained minor injuries and could return on their own accord under covering fire, one of the casualties could not due to the seriousness of his wounds. Cpl Singh treated the man's wounds then carried him, single handed back across the open ground to friendly positions. During this return, one of the previous casualties had been hit again and lay in an exposed position. Cpl Singh returned to the casualty, placing his own body between the casualty and the enemy fire in order to render medical assistance. It was during this, that Corporal Singh was struck multiple times by enemy machine gun fire, grievously wounding him. Despite this, Corporal Singh remained with his body shielding the casualty until they were recovered by members of the Parachute Regiment. While Corporal Singh later died of his wounds, the treated casualty survived. By his actions, displaying exceptional valour in the face of overwhelming enemy fire, placing himself in extreme danger to rescue British soldiers wounded in action, Corporal Dalvinder Singh upheld the very highest traditions of the Royal Army Medical Corps, sacrificing his own life so that others may live, while personifying the Corps motto - Steadfast In Adversity he inspired many subsequent acts of bravery during this engagement, Corporal Dalvinder Singh is awarded by order of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, The Victoria Cross, this day, 31st August 2010.
Another great piece. Thanks for these!
|
|
oldbleep
Petty Officer 2nd Class
Posts: 34
Likes: 38
|
Post by oldbleep on Feb 26, 2019 0:34:38 GMT
Two very minor quibbles about the gallantry citations in this excellent alternate history;
1. A citation will start with the following words The QUEEN has been graciously pleased to approve the award of the [Insert Award] to the undermentioned:
2. The timeframe shown is somewhat unrealistic. If we use the example of LCpl Leakey who was awarded the Victoria Cross for gallantry in Afghanistan, he committed the act he won the VC for on the 22 August 2013 but the award was not gazetted in the London Gazette until 26 February 2015.
A recommendation for the VC is normally issued by an officer at regimental level, or equivalent, and has to be supported by three witnesses, although this has been waived on occasion. The recommendation is then passed up the military hierarchy until it reaches the Secretary of State for Defence. The recommendation is then laid before the monarch who approves the award with his or her signature. Victoria Cross awards are always promulgated in the London Gazette with the single exception of the award to the American Unknown Soldier in 1921.
As I said these are just minor quibbles. This is a absolutely cracking alternate history and I am always in awe of you guys who write these histories. I look forward to the next instalment.
|
|
Dan
Warrant Officer
Posts: 258
Likes: 185
|
Post by Dan on Feb 26, 2019 5:59:40 GMT
Thanks oldbleep . I'll give them a rework. I have an MID coming up, I'll keep that one swift, and even allowing for wartime expediency, end of the month, in that case could be a bit fast. P.s. started with the first one. Edited the 2nd as well.
|
|