lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 68,215 
Likes: 49,617
|
Post by lordroel on Apr 24, 2024 15:05:23 GMT
As California and Texas, members of the Western Forces (CalTex) are consider stable, i see any exodus happening to the Mexico border of people living Nevada, Arizona and New Mexico when Western Forces (CalTex) and Loyalist (United States) start fighting in those states as these 3 states are vital for California and Texas to be able to get a connection with each other. I wonder if CalTex took over Nevada, Utah, Arizona, Oklahoma, and other loyalist states. I was wondering how their forces linked up on the way to D.C. while crossing into either Loyalist or FA territory. Well the road to D.C. is true them, as they do not work ore coordinate their efforts with the Florida Alliance, i see the Loyalist States that CalTex advance true being occupied by them. |
|
gillan1220
Fleet admiral
I've been depressed recently. Slow replies coming in the next few days.
Posts: 12,634
Likes: 11,357
|
Post by gillan1220 on Apr 24, 2024 15:09:56 GMT
I wonder if CalTex took over Nevada, Utah, Arizona, Oklahoma, and other loyalist states. I was wondering how their forces linked up on the way to D.C. while crossing into either Loyalist or FA territory. Well the road to D.C. is true them, as they do not work ore coordinate their efforts with the Florida Alliance, i see the Loyalist States that CalTex advance true being occupied by them. I'd see them being occupied or at least these states surrendering to join the CalTex alliance. |
|
lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 68,215
Likes: 49,617
|
Post by lordroel on Apr 24, 2024 15:11:29 GMT
I'd see them being occupied or at least these states surrendering to join the CalTex alliance.[/quote] Expect some fighting of die hard Loyalist States supporters in those states. |
|
spiegel
Warrant Officer
Posts: 244
Likes: 269
|
Post by spiegel on Apr 25, 2024 3:19:49 GMT
NORAD issue the loyalist might controlled it until the end of 2ACW.
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 68,215
Likes: 49,617
|
Post by lordroel on Apr 25, 2024 3:42:17 GMT
NORAD issue the loyalist might controlled it until the end of 2ACW. Yep but without Canada taking part in NORAD. |
|
lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 68,215
Likes: 49,617
|
Post by lordroel on May 2, 2024 16:28:33 GMT
Sombody had time on his hands.
CIVIL WAR Movie According to Hearts of Iron IV.
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,900
Likes: 13,280
|
Post by stevep on May 2, 2024 19:40:05 GMT
Sombody had time on his hands. CIVIL WAR Movie According to Hearts of Iron IV.
Interesting, especially the way the loyalist states come back from what looks like total defeat and also the date as it seems to start long before the date in the war. Mind you that might be because the mod facility sets limits to the date.
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 68,215
Likes: 49,617
|
Post by lordroel on May 2, 2024 19:43:54 GMT
Sombody had time on his hands. CIVIL WAR Movie According to Hearts of Iron IV. Interesting, especially the way the loyalist states come back from what looks like total defeat and also the date as it seems to start long before the date in the war. Mind you that might be because the mod facility sets limits to the date.
Also shows that the Western Forces are the most disadvantages of all four factions, even if we go what we now in the movie, they should not been able to move all the way to D.C. as they had the the most distance to move out of the Florida Alliance and the New People's Army. |
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,900
Likes: 13,280
|
Post by stevep on May 4, 2024 23:39:40 GMT
Interesting, especially the way the loyalist states come back from what looks like total defeat and also the date as it seems to start long before the date in the war. Mind you that might be because the mod facility sets limits to the date.
Also shows that the Western Forces are the most disadvantages of all four factions, even if we go what we now in the movie, they should not been able to move all the way to D.C. as they had the the most distance to move out of the Florida Alliance and the New People's Army.
Plus over a lot less population and probably industrial base. Other than the Pacific coast a lot of that territory has very little population.
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 68,215
Likes: 49,617
|
Post by lordroel on Jun 6, 2024 17:56:27 GMT
If there was a detailed TL of the movie, this one on AH.com is a good one: A24's Civil War |
|
mrsticka
Petty Officer 1st Class
Posts: 94
Likes: 38
|
Post by mrsticka on Jun 6, 2024 21:20:02 GMT
I've seen trailers for Civil War and it seems very terrifying. But what seems so unrealistic is California and Texas actually forming an alliance. Because California is largely Democrat dominated and Texas is more Republican dominated. To me, it seems like that's the last thing they would do.
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,900
Likes: 13,280
|
Post by stevep on Jun 6, 2024 22:25:53 GMT
I've seen trailers for Civil War and it seems very terrifying. But what seems so unrealistic is California and Texas actually forming an alliance. Because California is largely Democrat dominated and Texas is more Republican dominated. To me, it seems like that's the last thing they would do.
I suspect the basic idea of such an extremely unlikely alliance is to take the current political tension out of it, especially in an election year. If the rebels were clearly from states aligned with one party and the loyalists were similarly aligned with the other it would make the film extremely political, which would be likely to be bad for business as well as potentially too explosive.
Also possibly the idea that the President had alienated so much people to such a degree that two deeply opposed groups such as California and Texas would be willing to ally against him.
|
|
mrsticka
Petty Officer 1st Class
Posts: 94
Likes: 38
|
Post by mrsticka on Jun 7, 2024 0:12:07 GMT
I've seen trailers for Civil War and it seems very terrifying. But what seems so unrealistic is California and Texas actually forming an alliance. Because California is largely Democrat dominated and Texas is more Republican dominated. To me, it seems like that's the last thing they would do.
I suspect the basic idea of such an extremely unlikely alliance is to take the current political tension out of it, especially in an election year. If the rebels were clearly from states aligned with one party and the loyalists were similarly aligned with the other it would make the film extremely political, which would be likely to be bad for business as well as potentially too explosive.
Also possibly the idea that the President had alienated so much people to such a degree that two deeply opposed groups such as California and Texas would be willing to ally against him.
Perhaps, but I still felt that it needed to be said. |
|
