|
Post by germanbread on Oct 4, 2022 16:04:25 GMT
What if Paraguay won against the Triple Alliance of Argentina, Uruguay, and Brazil? Let's say that the leader of Paraguay is some Napoleon level strategic master, and Paraguay wins the war. The result is that Paraguay annexs Argentina's Northern most provinces, Brazil's Southern most provinces, and Uruguay. Brazil and Argentina are internationally embarrassed, as they couldn't defeat a small, little, landlocked nation. This creates a grudge that Argentina and Brazil have on Paraguay. This likely causes WW1 to come to the South American continent, but that is a story for another time.
|
|
|
Post by Max Sinister on Oct 7, 2022 23:42:11 GMT
If Lopez hadn't provoked the Argentines by attacking their ships, and they had stayed out of the war... then, a victory would be a bit more probable.
|
|
|
Post by American hist on Oct 8, 2022 5:07:49 GMT
The Paraguayan War devastated Paraguay, and it would be interesting to see how Paraguayto be victorious or perhaps just not become a third-world country.
|
|
gral
Seaman
Posts: 14
Likes: 27
|
Post by gral on Oct 8, 2022 11:18:06 GMT
Paraguay against Brazil and Argentina together can't win; simple as that - you have one country willing to send as many troops as they could to topple López(Brazil), and another providing (much)less troops, but a secure logistic chain(Argentina). López only chance was to win over the caudillos from the Argentinian provinces of Entre-Ríos and Corrientes to negate the advantages Argentina brought in - and it seems that López thought he would get them on his side, but the biggest of them(Urquiza) chose to join the Argentinian government and Brazil(Paraguayan troops looting everything they could get their hands on on their way to Uruguay didn't help things, although there still was a lot of anti-Brazilian sentiment going round).
As for Paraguay not becoming just another third-world country, not with López on power, not with the way he ran things. López only has this image of a forward-thinking leader nobly fighting against two giants because it was convenient for a lot of people in the succeeding decades to remember him like that; think him as a 19th-century Saddam Hussein, and you will be closer to what he really was.
|
|