James G
Squadron vice admiral
Posts: 7,608
Likes: 8,822
|
Post by James G on Nov 22, 2020 9:31:56 GMT
Cancelled in 1965 by the then British Government, there was an RAF & Fleet Air Arm requirement for a very different Harrier: the P.1154 to be built by Hawker Siddeley was to be given that name. It was a V/STOL fighter but with supersonic capabilities. ![](//storage.proboards.com/6197418/thumbnailer/IRcWfSjbkGmvEhzIoSjn.png)
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 66,109
Likes: 47,426
|
Post by lordroel on Nov 22, 2020 9:34:38 GMT
Cancelled in 1965 by the then British Government, there was an RAF & Fleet Air Arm requirement for a very different Harrier: the P.1154 to be built by Hawker Siddeley was to be given that name. It was a V/STOL fighter but with supersonic capabilities. View AttachmentWould it look like this James G . ![](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/e2/7f/56/e27f563cb27aaf17556b30a1286ed59d.jpg)
|
|
James G
Squadron vice admiral
Posts: 7,608
Likes: 8,822
|
Post by James G on Nov 22, 2020 9:39:10 GMT
Cancelled in 1965 by the then British Government, there was an RAF & Fleet Air Arm requirement for a very different Harrier: the P.1154 to be built by Hawker Siddeley was to be given that name. It was a V/STOL fighter but with supersonic capabilities. View AttachmentWould it look like this James G . ![](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/e2/7f/56/e27f563cb27aaf17556b30a1286ed59d.jpg) I think so. What became the OTL Harrier was back then the Kestrel.
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 66,109
Likes: 47,426
|
Post by lordroel on Nov 22, 2020 9:41:07 GMT
I think so. What became the OTL Harrier was back then the Kestrel. It looks a lot sleeker than the Harrier we ended up with, but I think that makes sense for a aircraft that has supersonic capability.
|
|
575
Captain
There is no Purgatory for warcriminals - they go directly to Hell!
Posts: 2,484
Likes: 3,771
|
Post by 575 on Feb 28, 2021 12:58:39 GMT
Might have been to the liking of the Bundesluftwaffe as I recall they wanted it supersonic to stay in.
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 66,109
Likes: 47,426
|
Post by lordroel on Feb 28, 2021 13:09:57 GMT
Might have been to the liking of the Bundesluftwaffe as I recall they wanted it supersonic to stay in. Would look cool, but i could only found the OTL Harrier. ![](https://combatace.com/uploads/monthly_07_2014/post-3782-0-73435900-1406349887.jpg)
|
|
|
Post by simon darkshade on Mar 1, 2021 1:16:24 GMT
One of several contentious cancellations of the mid 1960s.
|
|
575
Captain
There is no Purgatory for warcriminals - they go directly to Hell!
Posts: 2,484
Likes: 3,771
|
Post by 575 on Mar 1, 2021 8:24:45 GMT
Might have been to the liking of the Bundesluftwaffe as I recall they wanted it supersonic to stay in. Would look cool, but i could only found the OTL Harrier. ![](https://combatace.com/uploads/monthly_07_2014/post-3782-0-73435900-1406349887.jpg) Absolutely but when Kestrel and P.1154 were cancelled 1965 FRG withdrew trying their own designs for a supersonic V/STOL as the British forged on with Kestrel now Harrier.
|
|