lordroel
Administrator
Member is Online
Posts: 67,966 
Likes: 49,369
|
Post by lordroel on Aug 8, 2020 18:22:03 GMT
What about USS Lexington (CV-16), she was a training carrier at the time, could she not be used. just asking. I would think Lexington would be available, but she's a manpower-intensive unit. I think RN would have trouble finding enough sailors.
That said, the Goshawks can carry Sidewinders and other ordnance, IIRC, so if she could be manned, she could operate as a CTOL carrier, and not just helicopter/Harriers carrier.
My thoughts,
Well she was the only regular carriers i think the RN could loan, doubt the Royal Navy would be able to loan ore allowed to loan a Midway-class ore even a Nimitz-class. |
|
1bigrich
Sub-lieutenant
Posts: 478
Likes: 611
|
Post by 1bigrich on Aug 8, 2020 18:25:48 GMT
Would the helicopters and Harriers also be borrowed and painted in RN colors.
Quite likely, I would think. If the ship is going, I don't see a couple dozen helicopters being a problem..
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Member is Online
Posts: 67,966
Likes: 49,369
|
Post by lordroel on Aug 8, 2020 18:29:50 GMT
Would the helicopters and Harriers also be borrowed and painted in RN colors. Quite likely, I would think. If the ship is going, I don't see a couple dozen helicopters being a problem..
That would be some Sikorsky H-34 (Royal Navy uses them as the Westland Wessex), Kaman SH-2 Seasprite and Sikorsky SH-3 Sea Kings. |
|
archibald
Ensign
The PRC was standing on the edge of an abyss. And Mao said "let's make a Great Leap Forward"
Posts: 359
Likes: 364
|
Post by archibald on Aug 8, 2020 19:17:23 GMT
No T-45 Goshawk by 1982. Very ironically, the USN naval training aircraft by then was two-seat A-4 Skyhawk (+ T-2 Buckeye).
You'd better keep them away from the Sea Harriers, even more after the Hermes or Invincible losses... |
|
lordroel
Administrator
Member is Online
Posts: 67,966
Likes: 49,369
|
Post by lordroel on Aug 8, 2020 19:23:08 GMT
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,832
Likes: 13,222
|
Post by stevep on Aug 9, 2020 9:44:04 GMT
No T-45 Goshawk by 1982. Very ironically, the USN naval training aircraft by then was two-seat A-4 Skyhawk (+ T-2 Buckeye).
You'd better keep them away from the Sea Harriers, even more after the Hermes or Invincible losses...
That would definitely cause IFF problems. Might you it could work both ways. Some A-4's coming in to 'land' at an Argentinean airbase and the people on the ground only notice too late their the wrong colour.  |
|
lordroel
Administrator
Member is Online
Posts: 67,966
Likes: 49,369
|
Post by lordroel on Aug 9, 2020 9:46:34 GMT
No T-45 Goshawk by 1982. Very ironically, the USN naval training aircraft by then was two-seat A-4 Skyhawk (+ T-2 Buckeye).
You'd better keep them away from the Sea Harriers, even more after the Hermes or Invincible losses... That would definitely cause IFF problems. Might you it could work both ways. Some A-4's coming in to 'land' at an Argentinean airbase and the people on the ground only notice too late their the wrong colour. Only British people who should have landed in Argentina was the SAS team in Operation Mikado |
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,832
Likes: 13,222
|
Post by stevep on Aug 9, 2020 9:50:24 GMT
That would definitely cause IFF problems. Might you it could work both ways. Some A-4's coming in to 'land' at an Argentinean airbase and the people on the ground only notice too late their the wrong colour. Only British people who should have landed in Argentina was the SAS team in Operation Mikado
They wouldn't be landing. Just dropping off some excess weight. |
|
lordroel
Administrator
Member is Online
Posts: 67,966
Likes: 49,369
|
Post by lordroel on Aug 9, 2020 10:17:01 GMT
Only British people who should have landed in Argentina was the SAS team in Operation Mikado They wouldn't be landing. Just dropping off some excess weight. True, it would have helped if they went some sightseeing at Río Grande, Tierra del Fuego and dropped some presents there, the Taskforce would less to worry about losing a carrier like what this thread is about. |
|
archibald
Ensign
The PRC was standing on the edge of an abyss. And Mao said "let's make a Great Leap Forward"
Posts: 359
Likes: 364
|
Post by archibald on Aug 9, 2020 11:17:10 GMT
You could invent an entire hoax to drive the Argies crazy.
"Hey look, you sunk a carrier ? and Atlantic Conveyor with all the helicopters ? Well... look, we have another carrier and Sea Kings and Wessex aplenty. By the way, watch for the Skyhawks returning to land... you may have a surprise..."
|
|
1bigrich
Sub-lieutenant
Posts: 478
Likes: 611
|
Post by 1bigrich on Aug 9, 2020 15:12:55 GMT
No T-45 Goshawk by 1982. Very ironically, the USN naval training aircraft by then was two-seat A-4 Skyhawk (+ T-2 Buckeye).
You'd better keep them away from the Sea Harriers, even more after the Hermes or Invincible losses...
You're correct. I was thinking of BAE's Hawk entering service, not the Goshawk.
A-4s do make for an interesting scenario, though, as lordroel's post indicates...
regards,
|
|
1bigrich
Sub-lieutenant
Posts: 478
Likes: 611
|
Post by 1bigrich on Aug 9, 2020 15:16:03 GMT
That's great, thanks for sharing!
It reminded me of the fictional story by NewGolconda about the 'Scooter War'. I posted a link over in The Media Fandom Hub
Regards,
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Member is Online
Posts: 67,966
Likes: 49,369
|
Post by lordroel on Aug 9, 2020 15:20:33 GMT
No T-45 Goshawk by 1982. Very ironically, the USN naval training aircraft by then was two-seat A-4 Skyhawk (+ T-2 Buckeye).
You'd better keep them away from the Sea Harriers, even more after the Hermes or Invincible losses... You're correct. I was thinking of BAE's Hawk entering service, not the Goshawk.
A-4s do make for an interesting scenario, though, as lordroel's post indicates... regards, Well to bad i guess a Skyhawk cannot operate from a Invincible-class aircraft carrier. |
|
