lordroel
Administrator
Member is Online
Posts: 68,066
Likes: 49,465
|
Post by lordroel on Aug 26, 2020 13:48:36 GMT
Aircraft Carriers - The Fleet Aircraft Carrier in the Interwar Years (1929-1939) - naval history - 48
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,865
Likes: 13,250
|
Post by stevep on Aug 26, 2020 14:18:39 GMT
Aircraft Carriers - The Fleet Aircraft Carrier in the Interwar Years (1929-1939) - naval history - 48
Just finished watching it and reading the comments. Given the discussion about a certain carrier/cruiser elsewhere there are some comments on how sections of the USN were still trying to get 8" guns on assorted CVs designed in this period. They even wanted a couple of 8" turrets on the USS_Ranger, which was a small 2nd Langley to save space so the rest of the carrier tonnage could be allocated to a couple of larger ships!
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Member is Online
Posts: 68,066
Likes: 49,465
|
Post by lordroel on Aug 26, 2020 14:47:30 GMT
Aircraft Carriers - The Fleet Aircraft Carrier in the Interwar Years (1929-1939) - naval history - 48 Just finished watching it and reading the comments. Given the discussion about a certain carrier/cruiser elsewhere there are some comments on how sections of the USN were still trying to get 8" guns on assorted CVs designed in this period. They even wanted a couple of 8" turrets on the USS_Ranger, which was a small 2nd Langley to save space so the rest of the carrier tonnage could be allocated to a couple of larger ships! Carriers schould only have AA guns, not guns used on destroyers and cruiser, but now i am starting to wonder how a carrier like Lexington with here 4 × twin 8-inch (203 mm) guns would have been able to defend herself against German battleships Scharnhorst and Gneisenau.
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,865
Likes: 13,250
|
Post by stevep on Aug 27, 2020 13:27:14 GMT
Just finished watching it and reading the comments. Given the discussion about a certain carrier/cruiser elsewhere there are some comments on how sections of the USN were still trying to get 8" guns on assorted CVs designed in this period. They even wanted a couple of 8" turrets on the USS_Ranger, which was a small 2nd Langley to save space so the rest of the carrier tonnage could be allocated to a couple of larger ships! Carriers schould only have AA guns, not guns used on destroyers and cruiser, but now i am starting to wonder how a carrier like Lexington with here 4 × twin 8-inch (203 mm) guns would have been able to defend herself against German battleships Scharnhorst and Gneisenau.
Not with those guns. If it has no escort and can't get a/c in the air to attack them in time it can only run. Although with a speed of ~33kts it can probably escape provided not caught by surprise. Those 8" shells would only do minimal damage to a twin, while their 11" shells are going to be a lot more damaging to the far less well protected carrier.
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Member is Online
Posts: 68,066
Likes: 49,465
|
Post by lordroel on Aug 27, 2020 13:39:20 GMT
Carriers schould only have AA guns, not guns used on destroyers and cruiser, but now i am starting to wonder how a carrier like Lexington with here 4 × twin 8-inch (203 mm) guns would have been able to defend herself against German battleships Scharnhorst and Gneisenau. Not with those guns. If it has no escort and can't get a/c in the air to attack them in time it can only run. Although with a speed of ~33kts it can probably escape provided not caught by surprise. Those 8" shells would only do minimal damage to a twin, while their 11" shells are going to be a lot more damaging to the far less well protected carrier.
You mean Lexington is less protected then Glorious.
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,865
Likes: 13,250
|
Post by stevep on Aug 27, 2020 13:53:39 GMT
Not with those guns. If it has no escort and can't get a/c in the air to attack them in time it can only run. Although with a speed of ~33kts it can probably escape provided not caught by surprise. Those 8" shells would only do minimal damage to a twin, while their 11" shells are going to be a lot more damaging to the far less well protected carrier.
You mean Lexington is less protected then Glorious.
Its almost certainly got better protection than Glorious, especially if its original BC design armour is still in place, but better isn't going to make much difference if the Germans get an hit or two in and slow her down enough that she can't escape. No carrier on its own can mix it with either, let alone two ships each with 9x11" guns if they can't get a/c in operation early enough to stop/damage the enemy.
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Member is Online
Posts: 68,066
Likes: 49,465
|
Post by lordroel on Aug 29, 2020 11:51:25 GMT
KMS Graf Zeppelin - naval history - 49
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,865
Likes: 13,250
|
Post by stevep on Aug 31, 2020 15:31:21 GMT
Drachinifel has done his weekly drydock, i.e. a question and answer session and its a monster at just over 3 hours. Fortunately he gives tags for each question so you can select which ones are of interest and also hear the start to see if it might be one for you. The link is at Drydock 109.
At one point, refering to two USS Texas he asked what the plurals of Texas was which prompted a number of replies one of which was unrelated but made me smile.
There were a couple of other snippets I caught, both about USN ships.
a) Apparently the USS Massachusetts was the only BB, that went through WWII without losing a man in action.
b) He had an appeal at the end about USS New Jersey which because of the current corona crisis is closing access to the ship because their not getting the visitor numbers to make it viable. As such their not going to be making any money to support the ship so their setting up an appeal to raise funds.
Steve
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Member is Online
Posts: 68,066
Likes: 49,465
|
Post by lordroel on Aug 31, 2020 15:43:48 GMT
Drachinifel has done his weekly drydock, i.e. a question and answer session and its a monster at just over 3 hours. Fortunately he gives tags for each question so you can select which ones are of interest and also hear the start to see if it might be one for you. The link is at Drydock 109. At one point, refering to two USS Texas he asked what the plurals of Texas was which prompted a number of replies one of which was unrealted but made me smile.
There were a couple of other snippets I caught, both about USN ships. a) Apparently the USS Massachusetts was the only BB, that went through WWII without losing a man in action. b) He had an appear at the end about USS New Jersey which because of the current corona crisis is closing access to the ship because their not getting the visitor numbers to make it viable. As such their not going to be making any money to support the ship so their setting up an appeal to raise funds. Steve
I always like his Drydocks, but have not yet touched of a good question to ask.
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Member is Online
Posts: 68,066
Likes: 49,465
|
Post by lordroel on Sept 2, 2020 11:39:16 GMT
Queen Elizabeth Class - Design and Damage History - naval history - 50
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Member is Online
Posts: 68,066
Likes: 49,465
|
Post by lordroel on Sept 5, 2020 14:38:38 GMT
USS Helena - naval history - 51
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,865
Likes: 13,250
|
Post by stevep on Sept 5, 2020 17:29:40 GMT
USS Helena - naval history - 51
Its interesting and a couple of classical Drachinifelism. Seen it already earlier this afternoon. He also posted a Drydock 109 live segment, but that's nearly 3 hours long and doesn't have the editing to show what topics he's going to cover so didn't have the time to plough through it else I might have linked it here.
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Member is Online
Posts: 68,066
Likes: 49,465
|
Post by lordroel on Sept 5, 2020 17:37:33 GMT
USS Helena - naval history - 51 Its interesting and a couple of classical Drachinifelism. Seen it already earlier this afternoon. He also posted a Drydock 109 live segment, but that's nearly 3 hours long and doesn't have the editing to show what topics he's going to cover so didn't have the time to plough through it else I might have linked it here.
There is also a new but smaller channel Drach once mentioned called: TheShipYard
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Member is Online
Posts: 68,066
Likes: 49,465
|
Post by lordroel on Sept 10, 2020 15:36:17 GMT
The A6M Naval Carrier Fighter - Homegrown or Copy? - naval history - 52
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Member is Online
Posts: 68,066
Likes: 49,465
|
Post by lordroel on Sept 12, 2020 11:30:47 GMT
HMAS Bathurst - naval history - 53
|
|