lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 68,117
Likes: 49,506
|
Post by lordroel on Sept 16, 2022 15:29:20 GMT
That is fun, do a update on several days, and then the browser shuts down on your PC, the trolls are not happy they have to start over.
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,869
Likes: 13,254
|
Post by stevep on Sept 18, 2022 11:24:43 GMT
From today's WWI post.
Well that sounds like a significant opportunity missed. Both in terms of territory success and probable prisoner haul and in that such an action is going to make the Austrian leadership weary of a lot of its Slavic forces, especially since its likely to give ideas to others.
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,869
Likes: 13,254
|
Post by stevep on Sept 19, 2022 11:12:11 GMT
Lordroel On today's WWII post there's a bit missing from the description of USS Haggard - namely its main guns. It lists the lighter guns for AA protection but not the 5 single 5" guns. See its wiki entry for details. - Well unless the troll responsible for the article got hungry and ate them.
Steve
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 68,117
Likes: 49,506
|
Post by lordroel on Sept 19, 2022 13:34:36 GMT
Lordroel On today's WWII post there's a bit missing from the description of USS Haggard - namely its main guns. It lists the lighter guns for AA protection but not the 5 single 5" guns. See its wiki entry for details. - Well unless the troll responsible for the article got hungry and ate them.
Steve
Seems the trolls are not to blame stevep this time, this is how they got it from Wikipedia regarding the USS Haggard.
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,869
Likes: 13,254
|
Post by stevep on Sept 19, 2022 16:07:10 GMT
Lordroel On today's WWII post there's a bit missing from the description of USS Haggard - namely its main guns. It lists the lighter guns for AA protection but not the 5 single 5" guns. See its wiki entry for details. - Well unless the troll responsible for the article got hungry and ate them.
Steve
Seems the trolls are not to blame stevep this time, this is how they got it from Wikipedia regarding the USS Haggard.
Ah but I got it from the wiki entry which is the link I gave. Somehow they missed the line - see the box on the right hand side below the image of the ship.
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 68,117
Likes: 49,506
|
Post by lordroel on Sept 19, 2022 16:08:19 GMT
Seems the trolls are not to blame stevep this time, this is how they got it from Wikipedia regarding the USS Haggard. Ah but I got it from the wiki entry which is the link I gave. Somehow they missed the line - see the box on the right hand side below the image of the ship.
That is why this thread is for, to fill any gaps my trolls might have missed.
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,869
Likes: 13,254
|
Post by stevep on Sept 21, 2022 18:58:17 GMT
Lordroel On today's WWI thread you have:
Given feelings at the time and that he was obviously out of uniform its rather surprising he wasn't shot as a spy.
Steve
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 68,117
Likes: 49,506
|
Post by lordroel on Sept 21, 2022 19:08:30 GMT
Lordroel On today's WWI thread you have: Given feelings at the time and that he was obviously out of uniform its rather surprising he wasn't shot as a spy.
Steve Must be a small raider he wanted to take control over with only 5 men, you do not stop a British battle cruiser with that.
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,869
Likes: 13,254
|
Post by stevep on Sept 22, 2022 14:43:35 GMT
Lordroel On today's WWI thread you have: Given feelings at the time and that he was obviously out of uniform its rather surprising he wasn't shot as a spy.
Steve Must be a small raider he wanted to take control over with only 5 men, you do not stop a British battle cruiser with that.
Well I wonder if he wanted a ship where he could frighten the crew then go back and pick up the rest of his men. Possibly then seek to seize something larger. Although being a raider does suggest having some actual naval guns which is an issue.
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 68,117
Likes: 49,506
|
Post by lordroel on Sept 22, 2022 14:45:12 GMT
Must be a small raider he wanted to take control over with only 5 men, you do not stop a British battle cruiser with that. Well I wonder if he wanted a ship where he could frighten the crew then go back and pick up the rest of his men. Possibly then seek to seize something larger. Although being a raider does suggest having some actual naval guns which is an issue. That could be the case, but we will never know.
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,869
Likes: 13,254
|
Post by stevep on Sept 22, 2022 14:56:28 GMT
On today's WWI post you have the bit about German plans in the occupied Baltic region, i.e.
You also reported that yesterday. Possibly the 2nd part could be the German nobles declared Courland independent on the 21st and agree with the German plan for settling German war veterans there on the 22nd?
On today's WWII post you mention the attack on Tirptiz by the X boats.
That seems to suggest different fates for X-10, sunk with all hands in the fijord and also getting back to the parent sub before beings scuttled?
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 68,117
Likes: 49,506
|
Post by lordroel on Sept 22, 2022 15:00:40 GMT
On today's WWI post you have the bit about German plans in the occupied Baltic region, i.e.
You also reported that yesterday. Possibly the 2nd part could be the German nobles declared Courland independent on the 21st and agree with the German plan for settling German war veterans there on the 22nd? On today's WWII post you mention the attack on Tirptiz by the X boats.
That seems to suggest different fates for X-10, sunk with all hands in the fijord and also getting back to the parent sub before beings scuttled?
Thanks stevep, will see what went wrong, of course the trolls will be punished accordingly.
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 68,117
Likes: 49,506
|
Post by lordroel on Sept 22, 2022 19:29:55 GMT
stevep, a question you might help me with, as i work on the Civil War in Real Time i do not know how to call the United states Army/Navy, should i keep calling them United states Army and United states Navy ore as it seems during the Civil War they went with the term Union Army and Union Navy.
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,869
Likes: 13,254
|
Post by stevep on Sept 23, 2022 14:01:02 GMT
stevep , a question you might help me with, as i work on the Civil War in Real Time i do not know how to call the United states Army/Navy, should i keep calling them United states Army and United states Navy ore as it seems during the Civil War they went with the term Union Army and Union Navy.
Probably best for some of the US members to comment on that issue. I would say either US or Union would be fine but don't know if there's any political sensitivities involved? You also have the terms north and south as options as well.
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 68,117
Likes: 49,506
|
Post by lordroel on Sept 23, 2022 14:04:41 GMT
stevep , a question you might help me with, as i work on the Civil War in Real Time i do not know how to call the United states Army/Navy, should i keep calling them United states Army and United states Navy ore as it seems during the Civil War they went with the term Union Army and Union Navy. Probably best for some of the US members to comment on that issue. I would say either US or Union would be fine but don't know if there's any political sensitivities involved? You also have the terms north and south as options as well.
Thanks for the responds, think i will stick with the United States then, if wrong, the trolls will be the once to suffer.
|
|