stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,866
Likes: 13,252
|
Post by stevep on Jan 29, 2021 11:50:31 GMT
Just to say that in today's WWII post you have
Mentioned twice. Once under Battle of the Med and also earlier as the last bit under the Western Desert campaign.
Also further down you have Hopefully Major Rose's answer was - removing expletives - "there's a war on. Men start digging."
Its a tragedy that forces were still being sent to Malaya at this stage, especially when they had no time to recover from a long sea voyage or acclimatise but in this case it was the Aussies insisting on this, as you noticed a few days back, rather than Churchill. Amazed given the Japanese air superiority that they actually made it there rather than being sunk.
Steve
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Member is Online
Posts: 68,076
Likes: 49,471
|
Post by lordroel on Jan 29, 2021 11:59:35 GMT
Just to say that in today's WWII post you have Also further down you have Will edit it, thanks for the spotting as always.
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,866
Likes: 13,252
|
Post by stevep on Jan 31, 2021 16:52:10 GMT
Actually catching up with yesterday's video from Indie he's wrong about the Europe 1st decision being the reason why there was no relief effort for the Philippines. Not to reinforce them had been decided in the late 30's I believe because with Japanese control of the seas to the east and the islands in them it was deemed pretty much impossible for any relief force to successfully reach them. Possibly without the Pearl Harbour strike Roosevelt might have felt pressurised into trying some operation but it would likely have been a far worse disaster than Pearl for the USN. [Since ships sunk at sea wouldn't be refloatable and the casualties would have been much higher.
On the WWI post that fiasco with the a/c to E Africa is all too common an event for most/all sides in this conflict!
Steve
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,866
Likes: 13,252
|
Post by stevep on Feb 2, 2021 15:33:41 GMT
I think you may have something out of sequence in today's WWI post.
Townsend's force hasn't surrendered yet. Checking the wiki entry for Kut_World_War_I I think you have a 1917 post by mistake as Maude took Kut on 23-2-17?
Hell of a foul-up by that man in Kenya? Why the hell did he allow known potentially hostile tribes to persuade him to disarm his men??
Steve
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Member is Online
Posts: 68,076
Likes: 49,471
|
Post by lordroel on Feb 2, 2021 15:35:11 GMT
I think you may have something out of sequence in today's WWI post.
Townsend's force hasn't surrendered yet. Checking the wiki entry for Kut_World_War_I I think you have a 1917 post by mistake as Maude took Kut on 23-2-17? Hell of a foul-up by that man in Kenya? Why the hell did he allow known potentially hostile tribes to persuade him to disarm his men?? Steve
A seems you right, will edit it, thanks for the spotting as always stevep.
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,866
Likes: 13,252
|
Post by stevep on Feb 2, 2021 16:09:23 GMT
I think you may have something out of sequence in today's WWI post.
Townsend's force hasn't surrendered yet. Checking the wiki entry for Kut_World_War_I I think you have a 1917 post by mistake as Maude took Kut on 23-2-17? Hell of a foul-up by that man in Kenya? Why the hell did he allow known potentially hostile tribes to persuade him to disarm his men?? Steve
A seems you right, will edit it, thanks for the spotting as always stevep .
No problem.
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,866
Likes: 13,252
|
Post by stevep on Feb 10, 2021 11:56:52 GMT
Interesting that even at this late stage Wavell can still visit a Singapore not only under siege but being invaded and get out again.
Steve
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,866
Likes: 13,252
|
Post by stevep on Feb 15, 2021 13:24:52 GMT
On today's WWI post I was a bit surprised, in a number of ways by a) That a liner was shipping hay. - Checked and there was a liner of this name, see SS_Cretic, although possibly with the war on a relatively old and small liner was taking any cargo it could get.
b) That this stuff for Germany was being shipped on a British ship. Although possibly, since obviously no German flagged ship can cross the Atlantic and Britain had by far the largest merchant marine at this date it would make sense. Presuming it would have been due to be shipped to probably the Netherlands, or possibly some neutral in Scandinavia from which it could be transferred on to Germany. [Not asking you to investigate but just sounds a bit odd. However shows how the blockade was hurting Germany in such military potential materials.
Steve
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,866
Likes: 13,252
|
Post by stevep on Feb 18, 2021 15:09:58 GMT
Well Indie made a bit of an error towards the end of his video. Belgium was definitely not neutral in the conflict having been invaded and largely occupied. Otherwise however a good summary of events.
Steve
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,866
Likes: 13,252
|
Post by stevep on Feb 22, 2021 14:01:57 GMT
On today's WWI thread a) A typo in the gallent defence by the French naval gun at Verdun, where the last sentence is Obviously meant to be They.
b) On the peace terms House drew up you have: I wouldn't be so certain about that as he famously campaigned in the forthcoming Presidential elections as "the man who kept us out of the war" before the 3rd cycle of USW and the Zimmermann_Telegram prompted a reversal and his refusal to make any preparations for war suggests he was distinctly reluctant to enter the conflict.
If the report is accurate here then I'm surprised that the British government turned it down as seems to be implied. They could easily accept it in the knowledge that Germany would certainly reject it and hence win at least the moral high ground in the US. As well as continuing to prepare for a new offensive. Assuming that give Russia “an outlet to the sea.” relates to them controlling the Turkish straits which I can't see the Turkish government agreeing to either as it means their capital and largest city is under foreign control to some degree or another.
Great bravery shown in the French defence and if Driant had survived the French military would have taken a hell of a risk trying to courts martial him given both the performance of his men and that his criticism of the High Command is being shown to be totally accurate.
On the WWII post you have
Is this last bit meant to end like that as you have a spare " and it seems incomplete.
As you know I would have been one of those criticising the bombing campaign as a huge waste of resources, not least a lost of brave men, at least the way it was carried out with massed attacks. Targeted strikes with specially trained units is a different matter while a fraction of those heavy bombers could have drastically change the situation in the Atlantic which could have been a significant force multiplier in itself.
Steve
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Member is Online
Posts: 68,076
Likes: 49,471
|
Post by lordroel on Feb 22, 2021 15:17:44 GMT
On today's WWI thread a) A typo in the gallent defence by the French naval gun at Verdun, where the last sentence is Obviously meant to be They.
b) On the peace terms House drew up you have: I wouldn't be so certain about that as he famously campaigned in the forthcoming Presidential elections as "the man who kept us out of the war" before the 3rd cycle of USW and the Zimmermann_Telegram prompted a reversal and his refusal to make any preparations for war suggests he was distinctly reluctant to enter the conflict. If the report is accurate here then I'm surprised that the British government turned it down as seems to be implied. They could easily accept it in the knowledge that Germany would certainly reject it and hence win at least the moral high ground in the US. As well as continuing to prepare for a new offensive. Assuming that give Russia “an outlet to the sea.” relates to them controlling the Turkish straits which I can't see the Turkish government agreeing to either as it means their capital and largest city is under foreign control to some degree or another. Great bravery shown in the French defence and if Driant had survived the French military would have taken a hell of a risk trying to courts martial him given both the performance of his men and that his criticism of the High Command is being shown to be totally accurate.
On the WWII post you have
Is this last bit meant to end like that as you have a spare " and it seems incomplete. As you know I would have been one of those criticising the bombing campaign as a huge waste of resources, not least a lost of brave men, at least the way it was carried out with massed attacks. Targeted strikes with specially trained units is a different matter while a fraction of those heavy bombers could have drastically change the situation in the Atlantic which could have been a significant force multiplier in itself. Steve
Regarding the edit, will fix it. The Australian being shot is as it should be as the Japanese keep killing those who have already surrender in cold blood and it keep going and going on.
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,866
Likes: 13,252
|
Post by stevep on Feb 22, 2021 16:59:14 GMT
On today's WWI thread a) A typo in the gallent defence by the French naval gun at Verdun, where the last sentence is Obviously meant to be They.
b) On the peace terms House drew up you have: I wouldn't be so certain about that as he famously campaigned in the forthcoming Presidential elections as "the man who kept us out of the war" before the 3rd cycle of USW and the Zimmermann_Telegram prompted a reversal and his refusal to make any preparations for war suggests he was distinctly reluctant to enter the conflict. If the report is accurate here then I'm surprised that the British government turned it down as seems to be implied. They could easily accept it in the knowledge that Germany would certainly reject it and hence win at least the moral high ground in the US. As well as continuing to prepare for a new offensive. Assuming that give Russia “an outlet to the sea.” relates to them controlling the Turkish straits which I can't see the Turkish government agreeing to either as it means their capital and largest city is under foreign control to some degree or another. Great bravery shown in the French defence and if Driant had survived the French military would have taken a hell of a risk trying to courts martial him given both the performance of his men and that his criticism of the High Command is being shown to be totally accurate.
On the WWII post you have
Is this last bit meant to end like that as you have a spare " and it seems incomplete. As you know I would have been one of those criticising the bombing campaign as a huge waste of resources, not least a lost of brave men, at least the way it was carried out with massed attacks. Targeted strikes with specially trained units is a different matter while a fraction of those heavy bombers could have drastically change the situation in the Atlantic which could have been a significant force multiplier in itself. Steve
Regarding the edit, will fix it. The Australian being shot is as it should be as the Japanese keep killing those who have already surrender in cold blood and it keep going and going on.
OK thanks. I get that it just sounds a bit disjointed as if something had been cut off. [One of your trolls falling down on the job again. ] If the above was what you intended then no problem.
|
|
gillan1220
Fleet admiral
I've been depressed recently. Slow replies coming in the next few days.
Posts: 12,623
Likes: 11,339
|
Post by gillan1220 on Feb 24, 2021 7:12:58 GMT
Since Singapore fell days prior, it was the most humiliating loss for the British Empire.
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Member is Online
Posts: 68,076
Likes: 49,471
|
Post by lordroel on Feb 24, 2021 7:57:42 GMT
Since Singapore fell days prior, it was the most humiliating loss for the British Empire. Do not know if that is true, but a sever loss it was for the British.
|
|
gillan1220
Fleet admiral
I've been depressed recently. Slow replies coming in the next few days.
Posts: 12,623
Likes: 11,339
|
Post by gillan1220 on Feb 24, 2021 9:19:57 GMT
Since Singapore fell days prior, it was the most humiliating loss for the British Empire. Do not know if that is true, but a sever loss it was for the British. It was named Gibraltar of the East for the very reason it was an impregnable fortress.
|
|