|
Post by TheRomanSlayer on Nov 3, 2018 1:30:39 GMT
Historically the Caucasus region was the site of major wars between the Ottoman and Safavid Empires, each of them controlling all or half. This continued until Russia eventually conquered most of the Caucasus region, including the Circassian lands, and the kingdoms of Georgia and Armenia, and Azerbaijan.
Suppose the Ottomans have invested more in the conquest of the Caucasus, ie: through alliances with the Circassians or a bigger push on the part of either Selim I, Suleiman or Selim II's part. What would the Caucasus be like socially, culturally and politically if they came under Ottoman rule? Would Sunni Islam become more entrenched in Azerbaijan, killing any hopes of a Shia revival? What would the fate of the Armenian and Georgian populations be like under Ottoman rule?
Another thing: with the entirety of the Caucasus under Ottoman control, what does this mean for its relations with the Persians, Russians and the Crimean Tatars?
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,857
Likes: 13,240
|
Post by stevep on Nov 3, 2018 14:08:26 GMT
Historically the Caucasus region was the site of major wars between the Ottoman and Safavid Empires, each of them controlling all or half. This continued until Russia eventually conquered most of the Caucasus region, including the Circassian lands, and the kingdoms of Georgia and Armenia, and Azerbaijan. Suppose the Ottomans have invested more in the conquest of the Caucasus, ie: through alliances with the Circassians or a bigger push on the part of either Selim I, Suleiman or Selim II's part. What would the Caucasus be like socially, culturally and politically if they came under Ottoman rule? Would Sunni Islam become more entrenched in Azerbaijan, killing any hopes of a Shia revival? What would the fate of the Armenian and Georgian populations be like under Ottoman rule? Another thing: with the entirety of the Caucasus under Ottoman control, what does this mean for its relations with the Persians, Russians and the Crimean Tatars?
Given the nature of the terrain and the relative moderation of Ottoman policies with religion minorities in their early years the Armenians and Georgians would probably be reasonably OK until things start coming apart. We know what happened then for the Armenians and a lot of the Assyrian Christians .
If they control the entire area and provided they treat the population decently its the sort of terrain that its difficult to take but likely to make them high on the hit list of their neighbours as it also gives them a basis for attacking those same neighbours.
|
|
|
Post by TheRomanSlayer on Nov 3, 2018 18:40:47 GMT
That is true, but in the long term we might also have a growth of Muslim populations in Georgia and Armenia in the future as well. Another thing too is that Azerbaijan and the Circassian territories would be far more integrated into the Ottoman system, with the Circassians becoming Turkicized.
|
|