James G
Squadron vice admiral
Posts: 7,608
Likes: 8,833
|
Post by James G on Mar 11, 2018 16:10:17 GMT
Ted Kennedy is going to go down in history for all the wrong reasons, you can bet on that. Especially come September 1984.
|
|
James G
Squadron vice admiral
Posts: 7,608
Likes: 8,833
|
Post by James G on Mar 11, 2018 16:11:13 GMT
Chapter Five – Give Peace A Chance
(65)
January 1982:
Kennedy’s first State of the Union Address was a big deal. Congress was packed with members and guests while the speech was carried live on the radio and the television: tens of millions of Americans heard and saw what the president had to say. The staged managed event in Washington was the focus of much of the country: it had a relevance abroad too. Kennedy spoke for an hour though, as was usually the case, there were many interruptions of applause. He had a lot to talk about. There was a domestic focus at the beginning of the speech where he spoke of the first signs of recovery in the economy under his administration before he moved to the key elements of his legislative agenda. There was mention made of progress on social security and the DC voting rights bill though the stalling of universal free healthcare. The president urged Congress to bring that latter bill into law so that Americans could benefit from it: what he deemed ‘vested interests’ were against that, lobbyists for the medical insurance companies. There was a focus on women’s rights too with the and how he wanted to see the equal rights bill passed by the individual states to become the next constitutional amendment. The passionate liberal which was Ted Kennedy spoke about what he cared much about domestically before he turned to foreign affairs.
The President talked about his plans for a new wave of diplomatic initiatives in the Middle East. He hoped that by giving peace a chance, by working with all sides, the current conflicts could be brought to an end. The Sinai, the West Bank & Jerusalem, Lebanon and Kuwait were all conflicts he wanted to see solved. Kennedy asked rhetorically if it was too much to hope for. If it was thought to be, he aimed to change that perception. Elsewhere in the world, the president spoke of how it was no longer the case that the United States was supporting undemocratic regimes where there were serious cases of human rights abuses. He told his audience that he was proud of this in the face of opposition to such a ‘bold approach’. The country’s dependence on foreign energy sources, of which had caused so much economic damage to America and hurt the American people, was something which he was seeking to lessen. Kennedy admitted that he wasn’t too fond of oil and other hydrocarbon extraction yet the drilling in Alaska and through the American West was being monitored heavily by the Environmental Protection Agency. In addition, it meant jobs for American workers and money in the pockets of Americans. He made mention of one of his primary opponents who was in the audience in Congress for his speech, his invited guest which was Governor Brown from California. California was leading the way in environmentally-friendly energy production: if that was followed nationwide, within the next few decades the whole country could be ‘free’ of foreign energy dependence.
Finally, he moved to the Soviet Union and diplomatic relations with Moscow. Kennedy was proud of how he was having his administration engage with the Soviets. The ever-present threat of nuclear warfare was being reduced with those diplomatic exchanges. Kennedy said that American national security neither at home nor aboard was being endangered by what was being done. Understandings had been reached with the Soviets and achievements already made. He looked forward to more of those agreements with Moscow, so should all Americans. No one wanted war and his aim was to make sure that the risk of that starting was being lowered. A dream of his was to one day see the complete elimination of nuclear weapons, those aimed at cities and civilians.
Following the speech, there was an official reply made by the Republican leadership in a bit of a damp squid of a response. Far fewer Americans were witness to the coverage of that and the relevance wasn’t there in the minds of the American people. What Kennedy had to say was important. Those who agreed with him usually did so after his speech. Those who opposed him continued to do so. Those caught in the middle of opinions on Kennedy went either way. Kennedy remained divisive across the country. The Kennedy Magic didn’t work on everyone and those who hated the man’s politics were committed to that. A week before the speech, at a protest against Kennedy when he was attending an event up in Philadelphia, there had been signs raised by those protesters: ‘Remember Mary Jo’ and ‘Soviet Stooge’ had been some of the more prominent writings.
Kennedy still had many strong opponents within his own party inside Congress too. A year into his presidency, those opponents hadn’t given in. They were watching the polling numbers for the upcoming mid-term elections and saw that there was a good chance that as the president’s party, the Democrats were going to take a beating come November. Backing away from the president for the time being was good electoral sense for some. Other opponents had a more determined opposition rather than a temporary one. They were the ones who’d long opposed Kennedy, back during the primaries when they started two years ago, as someone who was the wrong man for the presidency, especially when it came to foreign affairs. Some of them were noted fellow liberals; others certainly not. All could agree though that after a year of him in the White House, they were absolutely correct on this. Having to rely on the Republicans (who were certain to get their act together soon enough after the shock of Reagan’s defeat) to oppose Kennedy wasn’t for them: they carried on doing so themselves. Kennedy wasn’t going to get everything his own way. Further deals with the Soviets would be opposed and so too would the cutting of relations with further allies which didn’t suit the president’s political tastes. Foreign aid, defence appropriations and support for US intelligence agencies remained in Congressional hands. There was a belief that the worst excesses of Kennedy could be stopped by Congress. They’d find out if they were right or wrong in that belief come the summit which the president was off to next month.
|
|
lordbyron
Warrant Officer
Posts: 235
Likes: 133
|
Post by lordbyron on Mar 11, 2018 17:52:40 GMT
Yeah, what could possibly go wrong for Kennedy at this point?
|
|
|
Post by lukedalton on Mar 11, 2018 18:45:58 GMT
Well, at least in term of internal politics Kennedy seem competent and frankly anything in the short, medium and long term beat the 'Reaganomics'; frankly for Kennedy to keep his critics at bay need two things
- Some agreement between Israel and Egypt regarding Sinai similar to OTL. - investment in the military similar to OTL...with the added bonus that's mean money for the americans
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 68,074
Likes: 49,471
|
Post by lordroel on Mar 11, 2018 18:48:32 GMT
Ted Kennedy is going to go down in history for all the wrong reasons, you can bet on that. Especially come September 1984. So we end up with a great Kennedy and a Kennedy that will be remember as one of the worst presidents in the history of American presidents. Also James, congratulations on you promotion to Lieutenant.
|
|
James G
Squadron vice admiral
Posts: 7,608
Likes: 8,833
|
Post by James G on Mar 11, 2018 19:17:07 GMT
Yeah, what could possibly go wrong for Kennedy at this point? He's having a whale of a time: see below! Well, at least in term of internal politics Kennedy seem competent and frankly anything in the short, medium and long term beat the 'Reaganomics'; frankly for Kennedy to keep his critics at bay need two things - Some agreement between Israel and Egypt regarding Sinai similar to OTL. - investment in the military similar to OTL...with the added bonus that's mean money for the americans Many of these are being done, or at least appear to be being done. Kennedy will claim credit for it all though - as was the RL case with Reagan - external factors and actions of predecessors make these things happen in the early years of a presidency. So we end up with a great Kennedy and a Kennedy that will be remember as one of the worst presidents in the history of American presidents. Also James, congratulations on you promotion to Lieutenant. Along those lines, yes. Thank you. I look forward to my further promotions in rank too.
|
|
James G
Squadron vice admiral
Posts: 7,608
Likes: 8,833
|
Post by James G on Mar 11, 2018 19:17:37 GMT
(66)
February 1982:
Before the summit with Andropov in East Berlin, Kennedy made visits through early February to Paris, the Republic of Ireland and then Stockholm. After East Berlin in the middle of the month, the president was due to go to Bonn then Rome & the Vatican City (meeting the new Pope in the latter) before heading to Israel as the last stop on his trip. The crowds came out in the French capital to see Kennedy as he made an official state visit there; France and its people loved him. In Ireland, Kennedy went to his family’s historic ancestral home in County Wexford before meetings with the Irish Government. There was no trip up to Ulster for him though: the British Government had vetoed that idea late last year when it was mooted and that decision would cost London harshly come April for Kennedy took that blocking of his travel personally. Then it was Stockholm where the American president attended several official events before meeting with the Soviet leader afterwards down in the East German capital. Rome was a pleasant trip for Kennedy along with his meeting with the new Pope; Israel too was somewhere else he enjoyed with visits to Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and the Negev. The three days in East Berlin were the most important part of the itinerary for the president though.
The press called it the ‘Valentine’s Summit’. Such a name had a nice ring to it for them and was pushed by the American media crews who covered the summit once they were inside the East German capital. As was expected, the activities of them were monitored and controlled by the authorities who didn’t want them wandering. Bad weather and multiple off-the-record briefings by Kennedy’s entourage kept them away from doing what the East Germans feared anyway and telling the world the story of life behind the Iron Curtain that they didn’t want told. Kennedy himself spoke several times to the media as well. He had a series of four meetings in total with Andropov, quite a large number in such a short space of time. Interpreters and advisers were present throughout. Kennedy was treated with the respect that a head of state should expect and was rather comfortable while in East Berlin. He got very comfortable his second night there in fact. A French journalist, a woman whom he’d met when in Paris who’d covered his tour of the French capital, was snuck into his room by his aides when the Secret Service agents looked the other way. Not once did the concept of a HONEYTRAP enter his mind.
At the end of the summit, Andropov and Kennedy came to several agreements on a wide range of matters. Both were to work to support the establishment of peaceful settlements to the conflicts in the Middle East with regard to Israel, Egypt and the Sinai as well as Lebanon; other areas of conflict there would need more work but agreed to have them discussed by Gromyko and Mondale. They discussed strategic missile restrictions on the arsenals of each of their countries and thrashed out cooperation for working towards a SALT III treaty several years hence. There was agreement too on both sides aiming to stop the spread of conflict in Central American nations though nothing specific there away from a commitment to try to achieve an end to ongoing fighting across several countries by non-interference. That was a bit of a mess when it came to the Kennedy Administration having to explain to the press what that meant; Andropov didn’t have to worry about media questions and criticism from home. Gromyko was at the press event on the last day of the summit and was he not Andropov who then surprised the world with an announcement which the Valentine’s Summit would long be remembered for. Kennedy knew what was coming and took pride in making sure that nothing was leaked from his entourage on what the Soviets were going to do. He wanted the affect to be strong at home in the United States and believed that would be best done if nothing was leaked.
Before the end of 1982, the Soviet Union would be removing twenty-five percent of its troops from East Germany. The following year would see another twenty-five percent would leave East Germany too. Gromyko informed the world that the Soviet Union and its people only wanted peace. What better away to achieve this than showing Soviet faith in the American president’s promises that he only wanted peace too? Should the United States and NATO nations wish to match the troop withdrawal of their own from West Germany nor or in the future, the Soviet Union would welcome that. This withdrawal of theirs was unconditional though. The Soviet soldiers would leave regardless of what NATO did or didn’t do. Gromyko told the press that the Soviet Union was beginning the process of a hoped-for reduction in forward-deployed military forces across all of Europe. Furthermore, also leaving East Germany within the next ten months to add to this reduction would be nuclear weapons inside Eastern Europe further then East Germany. He left that details of that statement unsaid.
Kennedy stood to the side, with Andropov between him and Gromyko, beaming for the cameras. Just look at his success in negotiations with the Soviets to secure peace, something which his domestic and foreign detractors said couldn’t be done. He knew exactly what he was doing, didn’t he?
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 68,074
Likes: 49,471
|
Post by lordroel on Mar 11, 2018 19:27:21 GMT
(66)February 1982: Before the summit with Andropov in East Berlin, Kennedy made visits through early February to Paris, the Republic of Ireland and then Stockholm. After East Berlin in the middle of the month, the president was due to go to Bonn then Rome & the Vatican City (meeting the new Pope in the latter) before heading to Israel as the last stop on his trip. The crowds came out in the French capital to see Kennedy as he made an official state visit there; France and its people loved him. In Ireland, Kennedy went to his family’s historic ancestral home in County Wexford before meetings with the Irish Government. There was no trip up to Ulster for him though: the British Government had vetoed that idea late last year when it was mooted and that decision would cost London harshly come April for Kennedy took that blocking of his travel personally. Then it was Stockholm where the American president attended several official events before meeting with the Soviet leader afterwards down in the East German capital. Rome was a pleasant trip for Kennedy along with his meeting with the new Pope; Israel too was somewhere else he enjoyed with visits to Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and the Negev. The three days in East Berlin were the most important part of the itinerary for the president though. The press called it the ‘Valentine’s Summit’. Such a name had a nice ring to it for them and was pushed by the American media crews who covered the summit once they were inside the East German capital. As was expected, the activities of them were monitored and controlled by the authorities who didn’t want them wandering. Bad weather and multiple off-the-record briefings by Kennedy’s entourage kept them away from doing what the East Germans feared anyway and telling the world the story of life behind the Iron Curtain that they didn’t want told. Kennedy himself spoke several times to the media as well. He had a series of four meetings in total with Andropov, quite a large number in such a short space of time. Interpreters and advisers were present throughout. Kennedy was treated with the respect that a head of state should expect and was rather comfortable while in East Berlin. He got very comfortable his second night there in fact. A French journalist, a woman whom he’d met when in Paris who’d covered his tour of the French capital, was snuck into his room by his aides when the Secret Service agents looked the other way. Not once did the concept of a HONEYTRAP enter his mind. At the end of the summit, Andropov and Kennedy came to several agreements on a wide range of matters. Both were to work to support the establishment of peaceful settlements to the conflicts in the Middle East with regard to Israel, Egypt and the Sinai as well as Lebanon; other areas of conflict there would need more work but agreed to have them discussed by Gromyko and Mondale. They discussed strategic missile restrictions on the arsenals of each of their countries and thrashed out cooperation for working towards a SALT III treaty several years hence. There was agreement too on both sides aiming to stop the spread of conflict in Central American nations though nothing specific there away from a commitment to try to achieve an end to ongoing fighting across several countries by non-interference. That was a bit of a mess when it came to the Kennedy Administration having to explain to the press what that meant; Andropov didn’t have to worry about media questions and criticism from home. Gromyko was at the press event on the last day of the summit and was he not Andropov who then surprised the world with an announcement which the Valentine’s Summit would long be remembered for. Kennedy knew what was coming and took pride in making sure that nothing was leaked from his entourage on what the Soviets were going to do. He wanted the affect to be strong at home in the United States and believed that would be best done if nothing was leaked. Before the end of 1982, the Soviet Union would be removing twenty-five percent of its troops from East Germany. The following year would see another twenty-five percent would leave East Germany too. Gromyko informed the world that the Soviet Union and its people only wanted peace. What better away to achieve this than showing Soviet faith in the American president’s promises that he only wanted peace too? Should the United States and NATO nations wish to match the troop withdrawal of their own from West Germany nor or in the future, the Soviet Union would welcome that. This withdrawal of theirs was unconditional though. The Soviet soldiers would leave regardless of what NATO did or didn’t do. Gromyko told the press that the Soviet Union was beginning the process of a hoped-for reduction in forward-deployed military forces across all of Europe. Furthermore, also leaving East Germany within the next ten months to add to this reduction would be nuclear weapons inside Eastern Europe further then East Germany. He left that details of that statement unsaid. Kennedy stood to the side, with Andropov between him and Gromyko, beaming for the cameras. Just look at his success in negotiations with the Soviets to secure peace, something which his domestic and foreign detractors said couldn’t be done. He knew exactly what he was doing, didn’t he? I think the Soviets doing a maskirovka
|
|
James G
Squadron vice admiral
Posts: 7,608
Likes: 8,833
|
Post by James G on Mar 11, 2018 19:30:17 GMT
The biggest of all Maskirovkas. The Game with Saddam was one thing; this Game with Ted is far bigger, more complicated and very dangerous.
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 68,074
Likes: 49,471
|
Post by lordroel on Mar 11, 2018 19:31:08 GMT
The biggest of all Maskirovkas. The Game with Saddam was one thing; this Game with Ted is far bigger, more complicated and very dangerous. And i fear that Ted has fallen in the Soviet trap.
|
|
lordbyron
Warrant Officer
Posts: 235
Likes: 133
|
Post by lordbyron on Mar 11, 2018 19:48:58 GMT
Oh, this is so going to backfire horribly...
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 68,074
Likes: 49,471
|
Post by lordroel on Mar 12, 2018 14:49:15 GMT
Oh, this is so going to backfire horribly... That i can agree with you on, the Soviets are showing one hand but with the other hand are moving new pieces to strike.
|
|
James G
Squadron vice admiral
Posts: 7,608
Likes: 8,833
|
Post by James G on Mar 12, 2018 20:42:12 GMT
(67)
February 1982:
World attention was focused on the fallout from the superpower summit in East Berlin. What It All Means was what everyone was trying to figure out. A certainty of peace was what many said. That might have been true with relations between the Soviet Union and the United States. However, elsewhere there was an uneasy peace about to be broken in Central America. Inside Belize, a British crown colony on the verge of independence, late-February saw the beginnings of a bigger conflict begin. Small groups of Guatemalan soldiers were infiltrated over the border into what Guatemala – when under various governments; this revolutionary communist one the latest – claimed was rightfully theirs. Whether the territory to their east was called by others British Honduras, the colony of Belize or an independent Belize, Guatemala regarded it as part of Guatemala. It was historically theirs. It belonged to them. The troops dispatched were under orders to establish a presence inside this stolen land and help with a revolt among the ordinary people so they could finally throw off the shackles of foreign imperialism and join with the new Guatemala being built across to the west. The poor exploited peasants (the opinion of Guatemala’s leaders, not those inside Belize) across in Belize would be encouraged to join in with the continuing revolution sweeping through Central America. They wouldn’t be the last ‘encouraged to join’ either.
Those soldiers inside Belize soon found themselves engaged in combat. The Guatemalans fought with troops serving in the Belize Defence Force (BDF), an organisation raised by and supported by the British authorities in Belize City. This was an army meant to take over the defence of the country when – whenever that might be – the British left Belize. The clashes between them and the invading Guatemalans were isolated events involving groups of no more than a dozen, maybe a dozen and a half at sites separated by many miles over the period of the last week of February. The BDF was responding to intelligence reports from locals of armed groups active in the jungle and on the edges of border villages. They stumbled into the Guatemalans on the first few occasions and then hunted for them afterwards. Those opponents of the BDF had failed in their mission to keep their presence hidden from the BDF and inciting an uprising. The Guatemalans soon found themselves fighting instead. Those localised infantry clashes between the two sides were short and violent affairs with civilians caught up in them. Both sides lost men killed, wounded and captured. There came withdrawals from the Guatemalans, deeper into the jungle, and chases made by the BDF after them. The BDF soldiers identified who they were chasing and aimed to kill them while also recovering the comrades dragged away as prisoners by an enemy who wouldn’t stand and fight but rather run away. The fighting continued after each initial clash with pursuits turning into more exchanges of fire. More BDF troops flooded into the area and they soon weren’t alone either: British forces inside Belize joined them.
The UK was eager for Belize to gain its independence and for the then country to join the Commonwealth and other international organisations. Diplomatic problems had caused a delay though 1982 was meant to be the year that Belize became a sovereign nation… no matter what Guatemala had to say. Guatemala had long had a lot to say on the issue of Belize. Since Guatemalan aggression had begun back in 1972, Britain had been forced to keep military forces inside Belize to deter Guatemala from invading and annexing the territory. Such an action would be against the wishes of the people in Belize, British interests and international law. Guatemala regularly intimidated that they were about to do that and therefore a garrison of troops supported by aircraft and helicopters was inside Belize. During early 1982, that British force to support the local BDF consisted of a stronger detachment than in recent years due to Guatemala’s revolution and public claims made of Guatemalan sovereignty over Belize. The British Army had a regular infantry battalion – 1st Battalion, Royal Regiment of Wales – in Belize along with the majority of a battalion of Gurkhas too which had been sent from Brunei late last year: that latter unit being the 2nd Battalion, 2nd Gurkha Rifles. The RAF had aircraft in Belize in the form of half a dozen Harrier attack-fighters organised into a flight (a partial squadron) and another flight of multi-role Puma helicopters. There were British citizens in Belize and British interests to protect, though the official mission was supporting the Belizeans themselves as they got ready for independence. When confirmed that Guatemalan troops were inside Belize, and fighting the BDF, British forces moved to respond. There were deployments to the border of part of that garrison and readiness increased across the rest ready to defend the country from further border-crossings. The men on the ground were ready to fight. They waited on word from London.
London would make a big mistake with the initial reaction to the sudden conflict in Belize. When what became the Belize War fully got going some time after the February clashes, there would be a major domestic political dispute. Resignations would come with some accepted and others deferred until after that conflict. War with Guatemala was a few months away though. When the reports came of border fighting by isolated groups of Guatemalan soldiers inside Belize, the British Government made the decision not to inflame tensions anymore than necessary. Those Guatemalans inside Belize were to be engaged. The BDF would be supported in doing so by British forces inside Belize there to defend the country. There was no hesitancy in that approach, one which was regarded at that point as being proportional. Meanwhile, diplomacy was the main approach taken. Guatemala was to be given the sternest message of British resolve to support Belize during its path to independence and told that Belize was still British territory in the meantime. Further border incursions would be met with force, not limited to just inside Belize either. This decision came from the top of the British Government with a certainty that the Guatemalans would listen. There was no military reinforcement of the garrison in Belize though. What was there was believed to be able to handle any more incursions, especially since the BDF had made a fine showing of itself already. Diplomacy and the implied threat of force, such was what London decided. However, the real decisions on how the conflict in Belize would go weren’t being made in London though: they were being decided in Guatemala City… and Havana too.
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Posts: 68,074
Likes: 49,471
|
Post by lordroel on Mar 13, 2018 3:52:17 GMT
(67)February 1982: World attention was focused on the fallout from the superpower summit in East Berlin. What It All Means was what everyone was trying to figure out. A certainty of peace was what many said. That might have been true with relations between the Soviet Union and the United States. However, elsewhere there was an uneasy peace about to be broken in Central America. Inside Belize, a British crown colony on the verge of independence, late-February saw the beginnings of a bigger conflict begin. Small groups of Guatemalan soldiers were infiltrated over the border into what Guatemala – when under various governments; this revolutionary communist one the latest – claimed was rightfully theirs. Whether the territory to their east was called by others British Honduras, the colony of Belize or an independent Belize, Guatemala regarded it as part of Guatemala. It was historically theirs. It belonged to them. The troops dispatched were under orders to establish a presence inside this stolen land and help with a revolt among the ordinary people so they could finally throw off the shackles of foreign imperialism and join with the new Guatemala being built across to the west. The poor exploited peasants (the opinion of Guatemala’s leaders, not those inside Belize) across in Belize would be encouraged to join in with the continuing revolution sweeping through Central America. They wouldn’t be the last ‘encouraged to join’ either. Those soldiers inside Belize soon found themselves engaged in combat. The Guatemalans fought with troops serving in the Belize Defence Force (BDF), an organisation raised by and supported by the British authorities in Belize City. This was an army meant to take over the defence of the country when – whenever that might be – the British left Belize. The clashes between them and the invading Guatemalans were isolated events involving groups of no more than a dozen, maybe a dozen and a half at sites separated by many miles over the period of the last week of February. The BDF was responding to intelligence reports from locals of armed groups active in the jungle and on the edges of border villages. They stumbled into the Guatemalans on the first few occasions and then hunted for them afterwards. Those opponents of the BDF had failed in their mission to keep their presence hidden from the BDF and inciting an uprising. The Guatemalans soon found themselves fighting instead. Those localised infantry clashes between the two sides were short and violent affairs with civilians caught up in them. Both sides lost men killed, wounded and captured. There came withdrawals from the Guatemalans, deeper into the jungle, and chases made by the BDF after them. The BDF soldiers identified who they were chasing and aimed to kill them while also recovering the comrades dragged away as prisoners by an enemy who wouldn’t stand and fight but rather run away. The fighting continued after each initial clash with pursuits turning into more exchanges of fire. More BDF troops flooded into the area and they soon weren’t alone either: British forces inside Belize joined them. The UK was eager for Belize to gain its independence and for the then country to join the Commonwealth and other international organisations. Diplomatic problems had caused a delay though 1982 was meant to be the year that Belize became a sovereign nation… no matter what Guatemala had to say. Guatemala had long had a lot to say on the issue of Belize. Since Guatemalan aggression had begun back in 1972, Britain had been forced to keep military forces inside Belize to deter Guatemala from invading and annexing the territory. Such an action would be against the wishes of the people in Belize, British interests and international law. Guatemala regularly intimidated that they were about to do that and therefore a garrison of troops supported by aircraft and helicopters was inside Belize. During early 1982, that British force to support the local BDF consisted of a stronger detachment than in recent years due to Guatemala’s revolution and public claims made of Guatemalan sovereignty over Belize. The British Army had a regular infantry battalion – 1st Battalion, Royal Regiment of Wales – in Belize along with the majority of a battalion of Gurkhas too which had been sent from Brunei late last year: that latter unit being the 2nd Battalion, 2nd Gurkha Rifles. The RAF had aircraft in Belize in the form of half a dozen Harrier attack-fighters organised into a flight (a partial squadron) and another flight of multi-role Puma helicopters. There were British citizens in Belize and British interests to protect, though the official mission was supporting the Belizeans themselves as they got ready for independence. When confirmed that Guatemalan troops were inside Belize, and fighting the BDF, British forces moved to respond. There were deployments to the border of part of that garrison and readiness increased across the rest ready to defend the country from further border-crossings. The men on the ground were ready to fight. They waited on word from London. London would make a big mistake with the initial reaction to the sudden conflict in Belize. When what became the Belize War fully got going some time after the February clashes, there would be a major domestic political dispute. Resignations would come with some accepted and others deferred until after that conflict. War with Guatemala was a few months away though. When the reports came of border fighting by isolated groups of Guatemalan soldiers inside Belize, the British Government made the decision not to inflame tensions anymore than necessary. Those Guatemalans inside Belize were to be engaged. The BDF would be supported in doing so by British forces inside Belize there to defend the country. There was no hesitancy in that approach, one which was regarded at that point as being proportional. Meanwhile, diplomacy was the main approach taken. Guatemala was to be given the sternest message of British resolve to support Belize during its path to independence and told that Belize was still British territory in the meantime. Further border incursions would be met with force, not limited to just inside Belize either. This decision came from the top of the British Government with a certainty that the Guatemalans would listen. There was no military reinforcement of the garrison in Belize though. What was there was believed to be able to handle any more incursions, especially since the BDF had made a fine showing of itself already. Diplomacy and the implied threat of force, such was what London decided. However, the real decisions on how the conflict in Belize would go weren’t being made in London though: they were being decided in Guatemala City… and Havana too. So the British have been dragged into a South America war, this is going to be interesting.
|
|
James G
Squadron vice admiral
Posts: 7,608
Likes: 8,833
|
Post by James G on Mar 13, 2018 9:04:49 GMT
(67)February 1982: World attention was focused on the fallout from the superpower summit in East Berlin. What It All Means was what everyone was trying to figure out. A certainty of peace was what many said. That might have been true with relations between the Soviet Union and the United States. However, elsewhere there was an uneasy peace about to be broken in Central America. Inside Belize, a British crown colony on the verge of independence, late-February saw the beginnings of a bigger conflict begin. Small groups of Guatemalan soldiers were infiltrated over the border into what Guatemala – when under various governments; this revolutionary communist one the latest – claimed was rightfully theirs. Whether the territory to their east was called by others British Honduras, the colony of Belize or an independent Belize, Guatemala regarded it as part of Guatemala. It was historically theirs. It belonged to them. The troops dispatched were under orders to establish a presence inside this stolen land and help with a revolt among the ordinary people so they could finally throw off the shackles of foreign imperialism and join with the new Guatemala being built across to the west. The poor exploited peasants (the opinion of Guatemala’s leaders, not those inside Belize) across in Belize would be encouraged to join in with the continuing revolution sweeping through Central America. They wouldn’t be the last ‘encouraged to join’ either. Those soldiers inside Belize soon found themselves engaged in combat. The Guatemalans fought with troops serving in the Belize Defence Force (BDF), an organisation raised by and supported by the British authorities in Belize City. This was an army meant to take over the defence of the country when – whenever that might be – the British left Belize. The clashes between them and the invading Guatemalans were isolated events involving groups of no more than a dozen, maybe a dozen and a half at sites separated by many miles over the period of the last week of February. The BDF was responding to intelligence reports from locals of armed groups active in the jungle and on the edges of border villages. They stumbled into the Guatemalans on the first few occasions and then hunted for them afterwards. Those opponents of the BDF had failed in their mission to keep their presence hidden from the BDF and inciting an uprising. The Guatemalans soon found themselves fighting instead. Those localised infantry clashes between the two sides were short and violent affairs with civilians caught up in them. Both sides lost men killed, wounded and captured. There came withdrawals from the Guatemalans, deeper into the jungle, and chases made by the BDF after them. The BDF soldiers identified who they were chasing and aimed to kill them while also recovering the comrades dragged away as prisoners by an enemy who wouldn’t stand and fight but rather run away. The fighting continued after each initial clash with pursuits turning into more exchanges of fire. More BDF troops flooded into the area and they soon weren’t alone either: British forces inside Belize joined them. The UK was eager for Belize to gain its independence and for the then country to join the Commonwealth and other international organisations. Diplomatic problems had caused a delay though 1982 was meant to be the year that Belize became a sovereign nation… no matter what Guatemala had to say. Guatemala had long had a lot to say on the issue of Belize. Since Guatemalan aggression had begun back in 1972, Britain had been forced to keep military forces inside Belize to deter Guatemala from invading and annexing the territory. Such an action would be against the wishes of the people in Belize, British interests and international law. Guatemala regularly intimidated that they were about to do that and therefore a garrison of troops supported by aircraft and helicopters was inside Belize. During early 1982, that British force to support the local BDF consisted of a stronger detachment than in recent years due to Guatemala’s revolution and public claims made of Guatemalan sovereignty over Belize. The British Army had a regular infantry battalion – 1st Battalion, Royal Regiment of Wales – in Belize along with the majority of a battalion of Gurkhas too which had been sent from Brunei late last year: that latter unit being the 2nd Battalion, 2nd Gurkha Rifles. The RAF had aircraft in Belize in the form of half a dozen Harrier attack-fighters organised into a flight (a partial squadron) and another flight of multi-role Puma helicopters. There were British citizens in Belize and British interests to protect, though the official mission was supporting the Belizeans themselves as they got ready for independence. When confirmed that Guatemalan troops were inside Belize, and fighting the BDF, British forces moved to respond. There were deployments to the border of part of that garrison and readiness increased across the rest ready to defend the country from further border-crossings. The men on the ground were ready to fight. They waited on word from London. London would make a big mistake with the initial reaction to the sudden conflict in Belize. When what became the Belize War fully got going some time after the February clashes, there would be a major domestic political dispute. Resignations would come with some accepted and others deferred until after that conflict. War with Guatemala was a few months away though. When the reports came of border fighting by isolated groups of Guatemalan soldiers inside Belize, the British Government made the decision not to inflame tensions anymore than necessary. Those Guatemalans inside Belize were to be engaged. The BDF would be supported in doing so by British forces inside Belize there to defend the country. There was no hesitancy in that approach, one which was regarded at that point as being proportional. Meanwhile, diplomacy was the main approach taken. Guatemala was to be given the sternest message of British resolve to support Belize during its path to independence and told that Belize was still British territory in the meantime. Further border incursions would be met with force, not limited to just inside Belize either. This decision came from the top of the British Government with a certainty that the Guatemalans would listen. There was no military reinforcement of the garrison in Belize though. What was there was believed to be able to handle any more incursions, especially since the BDF had made a fine showing of itself already. Diplomacy and the implied threat of force, such was what London decided. However, the real decisions on how the conflict in Belize would go weren’t being made in London though: they were being decided in Guatemala City… and Havana too. So the British have been dragged into a South America war, this is going to be interesting. It will not be pretty either.
|
|