"The Outlaw Josie Wales", "Segregation Forever" and Asa Carter. Just a taste of the American History

The South preferred state rights because they generally served the South well and could be used as a scape goat. The south before the civil war was a Jacksonian Democratic bastion and when whigs did when they were southern whigs whom were typically slave-owned slaves. The southern whigs were not strong enough to impact the 7 cotton states' constitutions as the document prevents protective tariffs, internal improvements, crony capitalism, and corporate welfare. When I read Kenneth's stamps work How the war came Taught me that it wasn't a myth that many more Yankees if not perhaps the majority of northern people were taking more faith in a stronger centralized government. The Jacksonian party was already declining and losing power as many historians note the Jacksonian spirit went away in 1854 after slavery tore our country apart. Now before the civil war when politicians talked about state rights, it often divided our great nation further, but it was always used to advocate for slavery. In the Jim crow times people used state Rights to have Jim Crow programs. Some people tries to use this propaganda to show how the south wasn't as bad after all A little bit of truth is dangerous goes the saying The black Confederate myths and reality Back to-state rights was a more popular idea in the 19th century which isn't well defined just as much of the lost cause isn't always well defined.

State rights can be anything one wants it to be however while we are in the statute destruction conversation What are we going to do with the union monuments don't always fit a Convenientnartive I believe that the south is or has been obsessed with white supremacy and the whole race issue because it was so relevant to it's daily life and whatever complicated race relations that existed during the days of slavery turned even worse during him crow(which I'm not defending slavery) With the Confederate flag Hate or heritage? This issue has affected where I work as a volunteer at a civil war site. While I don't believe a swastika flag is the eguivilant the CSA battle flag I believe it should be replaced with other civil war flags like the stars and bars csa flag or my favorite the bonnie blue flag that better represents the south/csa more Nobel attributes and aspirations
I feel that it is a yes and no answer if their needs to be school books to be rewritten ,but most students won’t come across the same lost cause history and from the beginning the northern perpective dominated acdimic civil war studies. Pouplmedia as long as I can remember was pro north. The littles rebel, the general, we're over 50 years ago And there were many pro-union books movies and narratives since the civil war ended. While the general was a real life train while I acknowledge that historical event far before I knew of the silent film and later , made the connection

I think you need to take Josie Wales for what it was, a Clint Eastwood movie with a variation of his "Man with No Name" character, a guy who did fight for the South but who ultimately realized it was a lost cause, and became an outlaw after he escaped getting gunned down along with the rest of most of his former comrades by a vengeful Northern Senator.
"North and South book II" despite its soap opera shenanigans, remains a favorite of mine from the 80s.
As for rewriting history, the North did this too, portraying the war as a simple black and white struggle between good Yankees and evil Southerners, the "lost cause" myth didn't really start until several decades after the war under the Daughters of the Confederacy who promoted Southern history books with the South's POV. Hollywood has always been more about entertainment than accuracy at any rate.

I want to ban Historical inaccuracies in films, but it would be impossible to do, and it would probably violate free speech. If someone attempted to sue a film for the film advertising, they were historically accurate, but they weren't, that could still be hard to do. While we're on the civil war topic, it would be interesting if the South developed a socialist csa party after it; no matter how minuscule and ignored they are, it could happen. Southern socialism However, Socalisim would have been associated with new England fringe groups and social reforms.


However, while there are still fascists in the South, they contradict much of the South conservative population. Now will the South one day elect a fascist governor or a firm white nationalist governor who can return laws to Jim Crow? depending what one call the end and the beginning of the civil rights movement They could theoretically reverse the civil rights laws somewhat, but those federal laws will always be there. Some people argue the civil rights movement is unfinished work, but no one can't discuss progress hasn't been made. The KKK IS kNOw CLASSIFIED as a Terrorist group and has shrunk substantially. People associate relate racism with the Confederacy and at least like to think of the North as less racist than the South. To some extent, the South has it coming because they follow Trump and mindlessly dislike Mexican immigrants.

However, the reconstruction policies were radical policies forced upon the South, and white southerners felt betrayed that the enslaved person and formerly enslaved people were being used as pawns in this debatable structural race war. (No, why not take advantage of enslaved people and arm them for the war effort against a slave nation)

In some ways, since colonial times, enslaved people have been seen as enemies just as society sees criminals as enemies, and those that don't die are locked up.

Since our nation became a Republic, we had sectionalism tensions. We first saw the North and found a clash over who gets the capital and who is responsible for the debt. As a people, we compromised for the will of the nation and her people as Americans have a great talent for compromising . By 1850, the North and South feud was much more apparent, and people could not agree on which policies they wanted enacted to serve each sectional interest. The South knew the North held them back and wished for independence without Northern meddling.



I saw on many occasions that people like to portray the North as the economic saviors who didn't make the economy worse than it already was.




1 The North destroyed the Southern economy through the abolition (The trans connintial in New Mexico territory as it was the fastest route and it was going spare up settlements in arid lands)

2the North rerouted the southern transcranial railway into a much longer route into Utuah -Kansea
3 The tariffs were for the northern benefit to the souths demise
4 The internal improvements generally bypassed the southern united states
5 When the Republicans took over, they only allowed Blackman to vote unless they were Southerner Tory’s , and many Southerners lost their farms and livelihoods thanks to a Union invasion.

5 Also, what little immigrants the South received were tampered with by Northern industrial progress and nativist policies enacted by congress

6 A northern victory means supremacy for northern railroads over southern states economic dependents on the Mississippi river steamboat traffic, such as the emergence of Chicago.when the south industrialized it often did not receive the fruits of its labor, sacrifices and toil. So much for state rights anyway only the South cared about it that much or at least on the national scale as the South didn't matter anymore it became irrelevant


My Ah TL will use elements of the lost cause from the Confederate propaganda machine, depending on what they are saying, as it won't say slavery is suitable for black people.