|
Post by simon darkshade on Apr 5, 2022 4:34:49 GMT
Agreed. A literal change to the outset of American involvement in the Second World War is going to make a lot of the (comparatively) minor downstream political debates of the 1970s seem like very small fry.
How can someone be persecuted for something they have not done and will now likely never do? I would suggest that it would be difficult to do so.
We are too used to viewing all events of our timeline as inevitable. The further back the change occurs, the more unrecognisable subsequent events become. This is one of the criticisms I had of the Navweaps story on this topic, whereby HMS Victorious nuked a Japanese surface force. The changes were very, very minor, involving Singapore falling just a little bit later. Such minimalist renderings fail the test of imagination.
|
|
stevep
Fleet admiral
Posts: 24,836
Likes: 13,225
|
Post by stevep on Apr 5, 2022 13:19:55 GMT
For the stick Trump gets, he is actually right that the swift decolonisation of Africa was a mistake. Kleptocracy, strong man rule, authoritanism etc. Question, what has this to do with the Nimitz.
I think that's in reference to the idea that the US would push faster decolonisation that OTL.
|
|
lordroel
Administrator
Member is Online
Posts: 67,988
Likes: 49,390
|
Post by lordroel on Apr 5, 2022 13:23:32 GMT
Question, what has this to do with the Nimitz. I think that's in reference to the idea that the US would push faster decolonisation that OTL.
A okay, thanks for the explanation stevep.
|
|
razor007
Petty Officer 1st Class
Posts: 87
Likes: 38
|
Post by razor007 on Apr 5, 2022 18:12:52 GMT
Already explored most of the WW2 side-effects so I'm focusing on the Cold War
Both NATO and Warsaw Pact would focus more on the Space Race so space colonization happens much earlier in this timeline...
...which is necessary since much less people die in WW2 plus China will be severely overpopulated. Environmental damage would be much higher.
|
|